TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Supreme Court of the United States Cases

Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta, 141 S. Ct. 2373 (2021)
Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, 564 U.S. 721 (2011)
Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012)
Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960)
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000)
Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee, 459 U.S. 87 (1982)
Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 525 U.S. 182 (1999)
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
Chiles v. Salazar, 146 S. Ct. 1010 (2026)
Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010)
Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11 (1966)
First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport, 146 S. Ct. 1114 (2026)
Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee, 372 U.S. 539 (1963)
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557 (1995)
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967)
Janus v. AFSCME, 585 U.S. 878 (2018)
McConnell v. FEC, 540 U.S. 93 (2003)
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995)
Meyer v. Grant, 486 U.S. 414 (1988)
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241 (1974)
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958)
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 585 U.S. 755 (2018)
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California, 475 U.S. 1 (1986)
Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 576 U.S. 155 (2015)
Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina, 487 U.S. 781 (1988)
Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (1960)
Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of Stratton, 536 U.S. 150 (2002)
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. 570 (2023)
Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241 (1967)

Federal Appellate and District Court Cases

ACLU of Nevada v. Heller, 378 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2004)
Americans for Prosperity v. Meyer, No. 24-2933 (9th Cir. Sept. 30, 2026)
Citizens for Responsible Government State Political Action Committee v. Davidson, 236 F.3d 1174 (10th Cir. 2000)
Coalition for Secular Government v. Williams, 815 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2016)
Doe v. 2TheMart.com Inc., 140 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (W.D. Wash. 2001)
In re Grand Jury Subpoena to Amazon.com, 244 F. Supp. 2d 1084 (W.D. Wis. 2007)
Majors v. Abell, 361 F.3d 349 (7th Cir. 2004)
No on E v. Chiu, 85 F.4th 493 (9th Cir. 2023)
Rosen v. Port of Portland, 650 F. Supp. 858 (D. Or. 1986)
Stewart v. Taylor, 104 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1997)
Thompson v. Hebdon, 7 F.4th 811 (9th Cir. 2021)
Washington Post Co. v. McManus, 944 F.3d 506 (4th Cir. 2019)
Wilson v. Stocker, 819 F.2d 943 (10th Cir. 1987)
Yes on Term Limits, Inc. v. Savage, 550 F.3d 1023 (10th Cir. 2008)

State and Local Court Cases

Alaskans for a Common Language v. Kritz, 170 P.3d 183 (Alaska 2007)
Alaska Policy Forum v. Alaska Public Offices Commission, No. S-18641 (Alaska Apr. 12, 2024)
Brush & Nib Studio, LC v. City of Phoenix, 247 Ariz. 269, 448 P.3d 890 (2019)
Center for Arizona Policy, Inc. v. Arizona Secretary of State, No. CV-24-0062-PR (Ariz. June 2, 2026)
Commonwealth v. Dennis, 368 Mass. 92, 329 N.E.2d 606 (Mass. 1975)
Commonwealth v. Wadzinski, 492 Pa. 35, 422 A.2d 124 (Pa. 1980)
Independent Newspapers, Inc. v. Brodie, 407 Md. 415, 966 A.2d 432 (Md. 2009)
Mobilisa, Inc. v. Doe, 217 Ariz. 103, 170 P.3d 712 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007)
Painesville Building Department v. Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., 89 Ohio St. 3d 574 (Ohio 2000)
People v. Bongiorni, 205 Cal. App. 2d Supp. 856 (Cal. Super. 1962)
People v. White, 116 Ill. 2d 387, 506 N.E.2d 1284 (Ill. 1987)
State v. Burgess, 543 So. 2d 1332 (La. 1989)
State v. Fulton, 337 So. 2d 1066 (La. 1976)
State v. Moses, 655 So. 2d 779 (La. Ct. App. 1995)
State v. North Dakota Education Association, 262 N.W.2d 731 (N.D. 1978)
Texas v. Doe, 61 S.W.3d 99 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2001)
Vondria v. Miller, 942 P.2d 1134 (Alaska 1997)

Constitutional Provisions

Ariz. Const. art. II,

     alaska policy forum v apoc breif in support of neither party

summay of arg

plaintiffs are correct on two of their arguments, that   the standard is unworkable, and that the disclaimer aspect require strict scrutiny,

the case may not be a suitable vehicle. the subject matter could be addressed in several other cases which are likely to be pending, az 9th cir case, and meta v washington state. the case could be held pending the resolution of those cases. 

the curt could summarily reverse, for recondideration in light of salazar and first choice. 

it could grant anf schedule full argument, perhaps in tandem with the az case, consolidated or not.  

  . october 8th 2026 to do list robbin w dani

0 make better list.  maker daily task list. make did/didnt lists.  

1.   repair order   

2.     schmidt probation office repprt 

3.     hava report

4.     make signs at kimkos

5.     clean path in room

6.     cle's

7.     get lawyer

8.     walk dogs cut grass

9.     clean yard

10.     light upstairs electric upstairs

11.    vigo county find letters.

12 housing for sherry

13 requests record sfor mighty 

 14 counterfiet get bodycam of cops runs to 4015 and the devin incident. ok.

15 sort trash hour a day 

16  vehicke trade ins

17 hundai

18 basement/green bags

19  clear bags 55 gallon ki 

 20 go thru sent mail to find missinf emails

october 8th 2026 to do list robbin w dani

1.   repair order   

4015 e washington 

2.     schmidt probation office repprt 

came over for 7yj ot 8yj time violating no cpontact order. was conspiring with sherry lynch 

3.     hava report

2 30 pm went tpo early vote on thiursday pctober 6th. walked in. lady at the door asks me for ID i say no thank you.  she asks again and i say more firmly no. thanks you. i go up to tyhe openb position, 2, a skinny whiote middle agaed woman.I say I'd liek to vote today if I can. she asks for ID I say no. she says without ID I can't vote. I say something liek ow, I was hoping top vote today. oh well it was nice meeting you. then i left. 

More clearly than yesterday, this was a HAVA violation. 

I happen to be a candidate for county clerk, so I monitor whether yhe poll-workers are properly trained. 

I tried ot make a video but remembered the audio isnt working. that was accross the street after the incident. i did not try to film the incident today. i will rely on my own testi,momey as proof but need to document it . i went to e204 but there was no one visib;le and it was nearly 4 pm. so i left. 

4.     make signs at kinkos

i made it down there but did not go in. got 5 fry baskets from 5 guys.  

x 5.     clean path in room

such a good job! 

6.     cle's

i looked up a few options but have not chosen one yet. needs more research. 

need about 12 hours more than befopre since a year has gone by. 

 

7.     get lawyer

the ai recommended somneone who it turns out is also doing permina basin pipeline stuff 2029 i mean electric line w eminent domain. so i adjusted my model.

anyway we did a 12 point memo on what gupta did wrong that it thinks can get this case blown out of thr water once i get a real lawyer. 

1 confliuct of interesst 2 standard of proof 3 denial of jury trail 4 denial of counsel, or continuances, after they removed my counsel, i could be confused there. 5  violate settlement privilege but has excuse 7 triple jeopardy 7 8th amendment timbs proportionality 8 4th amendment and section 11, 9 5th amendment taking and section whichever, not 16. 10 legacy of unethical conduct guttwein 11 lack of notic eot dusty sherry jay and michelle and dennison jordan. 12 lack of juridiction due to failure to exhaust adminstrative remedies, where i had filed a nonwaiver of admoinstrative hearing, and assert that filing that onc eis enough, it remains effective. 13 previously, counterlcaims were filed but mysteriously disappeared after the case was marked closed. deprivation of due porcess right ot appeal.

tiny iossue of cours eof dealings, how they stole my 5 volvos stole my talbot st house, arson at temple, re insruance, oh and i was tortured inthe jail, and they failed to take a report for attempted murder then he killed 2 people also h h treate dme for major depre4ssion, a life threatening illness. no ada claim was asserted or rlupia claim so thes enot be adjudicated. there were 5  more i forge toffhand. oh the 2 federal felonies at th emailbox, the refusal to use email or anythign better thn, mypoint was she could have done a better job of notice and comminication. the civil cover sheet hack. double standard, with regulatory capture. same judge later failed to recuse. oh and th ejudge is unconsntitutionally appoinbted instea dof elected. so that a good start but there are more. duty of civility on both sides.  

 Did: tried to vote. visited e204. found fry baskets. dani cleaned my bedroom floor and we made a list. need to feed the dog, put back trash cans. need to reach tht lawyer who ran against bell 

 

anyway we did a 12 point memo on what gupta did wrong that it thinks can get this case blown out of thr water once i get a real lawyer.

 

1 confliuct of interesst Gupta represents two masters - Hensley and City of Indy. Possible ethical concern.

 

2 standard of proof 

clear and convincing proof is needed for the functional equivalent of a taking, seizure 

3 denial of jury trial - did i raise the issue, or only in in re chico?

 

4 denial of counsel, or continuances, after they removed my counsel, i could be confused there. 

5  violate settlement privilege but has excuse 

7 triple jeopardy 

7 8th amendment timbs proportionality 

8 4th amendment and section 11, 

9 5th amendment taking and section whichever, not 16. 

10 legacy of unethical conduct guttwein 

guttwein: three issues: majors v abell, he represented the governor / personal capacity claims. he told judge mckinney that he would prepare the paperwork to certify the question to the state supreme court. at a hearing, the parties had agreed to certify the state constitutional questions to the state supreme court. if he deliberately withheld this paperwork as a strategic ploy to delay and derail the case, it worked. i have no specific proof of intent. there is only circumstantial evidence. scott chin could verify that there had been such an agreement. 

after the failure to certify the question as agreed, the case languished for over a year before the count granted a motion to dismiss as moo. this motion was erroneous and was reversed by the 7th circuit. 

the 7th circuit certified a different question, one of stauttory interpretation. In that role, the court refused to address the  state constitutional questions, and may have  had misplaced the record and had not read the complaint, which was mostly grounded int he state claims. 14 of 16 state courts that have  ruled on the merits of the questions in majots have followed talley. 

11 lack of notic eot dusty sherry jay and michelle and dennison jordan. 12 lack of juridiction due to failure to exhaust adminstrative remedies, where i had filed a nonwaiver of admoinstrative hearing, and assert that filing that onc eis enough, it remains effective. 

13 previously, counterlcaims were filed but mysteriously disappeared after the case was marked closed. deprivation of due porcess right ot appeal.

14 tiny iossue of cours eof dealings, how they stole my 5 volvos stole my talbot st house, arson at temple, re insruance, oh and i was tortured inthe jail, and they failed to take a report for attempted murder then he killed 2 people also h h treate dme for major depre4ssion, a life threatening illness. no ada claim was asserted or rlupia claim so thes enot be adjudicated. there were 5  more i forge toffhand. 

 

oh the 2 federal felonies at th emailbox,

 the refusal to use email or anythign better thn, mypoint was she could have done a better job of notice and comminication. 

the civil cover sheet hack. double standard, with regulatory capture. same judge later failed to recuse. oh and th ejudge is unconsntitutionally appoinbted instea dof elected. so that a good start but there are more. duty of civility on both sides.