Nat'l Org. for Marriage v. McKee, 649 F.3d 34
(1st Cir. 2011) ....................................... 16, 2 

green mountaint future

zwickler v koota, zwickler v golden, dismissed as moot erreously.

 

 39 s denny.

issue: depressed guy a year behind on his mortgage, squatters,  rehab didnt take. 

hoarder, house needs cleaned.  i get to do the front lawn.

idea get a title report. $159 ish. those folks who closed on the chiurch.  

To do: notice of lis pendens.

My name is Dustin __  I am the tenant in possession at 39 S Denny. I have been making the morggage payments of $419/mo. I made a downpyament of $_. I have equity. My verbal contract is worth. nothing, but I point to a many years course of dealings.

No eviction is proper; a full foreclosure would be required. We are willing anbd able to pay off th emortgage. if a fair split pf the equity can be agreed to or determined by the court.  

The point if this filing is to put the world on notice so there can be no innocent holder in due course, if the legal owener were to try to sell or encumber the property. cost around $25. record w faith kimbro soonest. 

 motions to file monday

motion to dismiss. comes now d and for his motion to dismiss says pursuant to rule 1, if this court has the jurisdiction and discretion to dismiss the case, defendants moves that it do so, so as not to clog the docket. this case is much ado about nothing. a simple solution would be to dismiss, with or without prejudice.  

perhaps the court lacks discretion to grant such a motion at this stage; at least we made the motion. it is not the intent of defendant to complicate the court's workload. similarly, we are open to formal or informal mediation or settlement discussions whether in chambers, open court, or elsewhere.  respectfully submitted

 

suggestion for status conference

This court currently has the matter set for _.  I suggest we use this time for a status conference to discuss the motions filed, or reset for a later time.  

notice regarding recusal

motion for jury trial

Defendant, Robbin Stewart, on behalf of Chico, a real party in interest, timely moves for trial by jury as of right per Article I section 20. Gates v Indianapolis 2013 is binding authority on this point see also Cunningham 2013. 

Additionally defendant on behalf of the dog chico, a real party in interest, moves for trial by jury as of right  per article I secction 19. Normally section 19 applies only to criminal trials, while this case is civil. But here where the ordinance is quasi criminal, the protections of section 19 also apply at least to some extent.   

Additionally defendant moves for trial by jury under the 7th amendment, as incorporated  by the 14th Amendment. This motion is to preserve the record. I do not the expect the trial court to grant on this issue. It is so that Chico has something to go to the Supreme Court with if needed. There is no recent case law on the 7th at scotus, or at least about incorporation. Cases from the 1880s are not controlling or persuasive. In Timbs, an 8th amendment claim of excess fines was incorporated. Chico would be willing to be represented by ij.org at scotus, or by ken faulk.  In the event that this motion is denied, a ruling on facts and law is requested. 

motion setting standard of review/ 

Plaintiff's counsel has indicated that she seeks to obtain a judgment based on preponderence of the evidence. The preponderence test is set out by statute as a floor not a ceiling. Here; where the ordiannce violations are quasi criminal a clear and convincing evidence test is required at trial (but not necessarily in a pretrial event, see blanche v muk choi lau 2026)  under due course of law, article 1 section 12. 

blanche v muk choi lau 2026. 

It can also be argued that if the state constitution had been silent on this point,  the 14th amendment comes into play.

Primarily this would be a due process claim, although it also a violation of equal protection and the p or i clause.  

motion for appointment of counsel or ala gaurdian at litem for Chico.

suggest best interest of the dog.

defendant is elderly, has concerns about his own mental health and competence. I am functionally illiterate and may not be able to zealously advocate for Chico. AI may introdiuce nonobvious false claims. 

 d moves that the court appoint counsel, at d';s expense, or appoint something similar to a gaurdian at litem with the best interest of the dog as its guidepost. 

I recognize of course that the dog lacks standing and is considered chattel. nor am i trying to mock the court. Here D's interests and the dog's interest are adverse. It would be easy enough to resolve the case by euthanizing Chico. He is at this point, if plaintiff's allegations are true, which they are not, an uninsurable liability.  

I can get another dog for $20.

Chico deserves better. 

I do not claim to be Chico's owner. I am here as a temporary guardian. The court may decide Chico's ownership if it chooses. a

TRhe dog may belong to Dawn Young, or Guy in woods. Tupac, real name unkown richared coombs? claims he has not been paid for ht edog. perhaps that makes tupac thew owner. He can be found usually in care of Patricia Beecher.    

In the event that the court denies the motion to dismiss, the motion for s change of venue or recusal, 

He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A Dark Knight." 

I am arbitrary aardvark. i fight crime. crime usually wins. 

oh, motion for findings of fact and law. in the event that any of my motions are denied, i request  fidnings of fatc anbd law, so a reviewing court has a full record.  

answer, affirmative defenses, counterclaims, (municipal liability  monell) crossclaims/

mandatory counterclaims. permissive counterclaims.

 

discovery

 motions to file monday

suggestion for status conference

notice regarding recusal

This notice is to inform the court that defendant happens to be the gop nominee for county clerk. I am not moving for recusal, but I am aware some judges have a preference for recusing and end up moving such cases out of county, to the court of an elected judge prepared for a jury trial.

motion for jury trial

motion setting standard of review/ 

motion for appointment of counsel or ala gaurdian at litem for chico.

suggest best interest of the dog.

answer, affirmative defenses, counterclaims, (municiapl liab  monell) crossclaims/

mandatory counterclaims. permissive counterclaims.

 

 

 

 

With respect to the nature of the underlying substantive claim, namely, the ordinance violations, our supreme court has held that “the violation of city ordinances” are “of a quasi criminal nature.” See Lickey v. City of South Bend, 206 Ind. 636, 640, 190 N.E. 858, 860 (1934).³

We also find Cunningham instructive on this question

Instead, in 1852, actions criminal in nature would necessarily have been legal. In such actions, a jury trial demand must be honored. Midwest Sec. Life Ins. Co., 730 N.E.2d at 169. We therefore hold that the trial court improperly denied Cunningham's request for a jury in violation of Article I, Section 20 of the Indiana Constitution. 

GATES v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS (2013)

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

 

 

Though they are now governed by the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure, speeding infractions remain quasi-criminal in nature—they are enforced by the police; complaints are initiated and litigated by a prosecuting attorney on behalf of the State; and violators are fined by the government. Because of this, it logically follows that, just as criminal actions were outside the scope of equitable actions as provided by our case history, so, too, would quasi-criminal actions have been historically non[-]equitable. Instead, in 1852, actions criminal in nature would necessarily have been legal. In such actions, a jury trial demand must be honored. Midwest Sec. Life Ins. Co., 730 N.E.2d at 169. We therefore hold that the trial court improperly denied Cunningham's request for a jury in violation of Article I, Section 20 of the Indiana Constitution.

835 N.E.2d at 1077–79 (emphases added, footnotes omitted).

Here, the trial court found, and the parties agree, that the ordinances at issue did not exist prior to 1852. Accordingly, we must determine whether this cause of action would have been considered a claim of equity or law in 1852. See id. at 1077. With respect to the nature of the underlying substantive claim, namely, the ordinance violations, our supreme court has held that “the violation of city ordinances” are “of a quasi criminal nature.” See Lickey v. City of South Bend, 206 Ind. 636, 640, 190 N.E. 858, 860 (1934).³

We also find Cunningham instructive on this question. While the nature of the ordinances at issue in this case has not previously been considered by this court, the violations at issue are quasi-criminal because they are enforced by the Indianapolis Department of Public Safety,⁴ complaints are initiated and litigated by a prosecuting attorney on behalf of the City, and violators are fined by the government. See Cunningham, 835 N.E.2d at 1079. And we agree with Gates that the mandatory fines imposed in this case are akin to claims for money damages, which were “exclusively legal actions in 1852 [.]” See id. at 1078

The nature of the underlying substantive claims brought against Gates is quasi-criminal, and he is entitled to a jury trial under Article I, Section 20 of the Indiana Constitution. We reverse and instruct the trial court to grant Gates' jury trial request. 

 

officer stacey rojas impd

hi. you stopped by and offered to help. at your convenience please drop by again, with the paperwork for a lost plate. i may ask you to take a lost or stolen vehicle report. i am seeking investigation of the following;  

 michelle marie rhotan russell 9 20 1980

stole passport money computers medicine cars (truck, van) the volvo. 

forged checks ched t card fraud at chase, federal wire fraud? disbarred nurse, jail for drug offenses, wrinkle: former client.  

being evicted from 42nd st by joe worely. 

jordan dennison strongarm robbery 3 years prison, stolen van

dennis dewight washington jr doing 3 years. strongarm robbery battery stole wallet office rof court credit card fraud 5th 3rd involvement

1/9/25 3 or 4 pm. corroborated by jay helm. 

devin somebody

carlos

scrappy / racheal

racheal's dead boyfriend

honesty rady  deceased

patricia beecher see warrants

trespassed here recently. raid at dope house? for her 

tupac

richie rich 

the dope house.

spwnt 20 minutes on this timer went off.  7 33 pm sunday 7/12/26

working late on sunday, typical lawyer.

 

 

tj thomas james burns? murdered at 327 n denny

zach mcvey

lydia bailey

who is the dope house guy

who is unc. duncan?

 

 

we heard they had a search warrant for her.   claimed gang affiliation chicago group. i forget. gansyer disciples no.    runs w tupac )also trespassing_ and his dad richie rich. not perry rich.                Reference	Case cross references Prosecutor Case Management Number 49D23-DM3244278 Police Agency Number IP250019234
Related	Co-Defendant Case 49D23-2503-F6-008274

Parties to the Case

Hide all party details

	Defendant	Beecher, Patricia
	Description Female, Black, 5' 7", 155 lbs. Address 2832 E County Line Rd Apt 30 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46205 Other Agency Numbers   000000822907 Indianapolis Metropolitan Police 75324 Quest File Number Attorney Kevin Parker O'Sullivan #3897849, Retained Attorney address   3115 Southeastern AVE STE 300 Indianapolis, IN 46203 Attorney phone   317-327-3838(W)
	State Plaintiff	State of Indiana
	Attorney Ryan Wilson Mears #2648649, Lead Attorney address   251 E Ohio St Suite 160 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Attorney phone   317-327-3522(W) Attorney Hugh Walton Ronald #3923749 Attorney address   251 E. Ohio St. Suite 160 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Attorney phone   317-292-6192(W)

Charges

Show all charge details

			35-42-2-1(c)(1)/MA: Battery Resulting in Bodily Injury
			35-43-4-2(a)/MA: Theft
			35-42-2-2(a)/MB:Criminal Recklessness

Chronological Case Summary

03/11/2025	Case Opened as a New Filing
03/11/2025	Case Filed Electronically Added By EFile Manager
03/11/2025	Information Filed Information Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 03/11/2025
03/11/2025	Motion for No Contact Order Filed No Contact Order MOTION Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 03/11/2025
03/11/2025	Notice Filed Motion for Stay Away Order Upon Release Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 03/11/2025
03/11/2025	Discovery Filed LR49-CR2.3-101 Case Consolidation Notice Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 03/11/2025
03/11/2025	Probable Cause Affidavit Filed PC APC Beecher.pdf Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 03/11/2025

 

Parties to the Case

Hide all party details

	Defendant	Beecher, Patricia
	Description Female, Black, 5' 7", 155 lbs. Address 2832 E County Line Rd Apt 30 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46205 Other Agency Numbers   000000822907 Indianapolis Metropolitan Police 75324 Quest File Number Attorney Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel #3888653, Retained Attorney address   3115 Southeastern Ave Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46203 Attorney phone   317-327-7449(W)
	State Plaintiff	State of Indiana
	Attorney Ryan Wilson Mears #2648649, Lead Attorney address   251 E Ohio St Suite 160 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Attorney phone   317-327-3522(W) Attorney Hugh Walton Ronald #3923749 Attorney address   251 E. Ohio St. Suite 160 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Attorney phone   317-292-6192(W)

Charges

Show all charge details

			35-42-2-1(c)(1)/F6: Battery Against a Public Safety Official
			35-44.1-3-1(a)(1)/MA: Resisting Law Enforcmnt: def. knowingly/intentionally forcibly resist/obstruct
			35-44.1-3-1(a)(3)/MA: Resisting Law Enforcement def. knowingly or intentionally flees from law enfo
			35-45-1-3(a)(1)/MB: Disorderly Conduct: engages in fighting or tumultuous conduct

Chronological Case Summary

10/07/2025	Case Opened as a New Filing
10/07/2025	Case Filed Electronically Added By EFile Manager
10/07/2025	Motion for Alteration/Revocation of Bail Filed Greater than Standard Bond, Motion Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/07/2025
10/07/2025	Information Filed Information Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/07/2025
10/07/2025	Notice Filed LR49-CR2.3-101 Case Consolidation Notice Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/07/2025
10/07/2025	Probable Cause Affidavit Filed PC APC Beecher.pdf Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/07/2025
10/07/2025	Probable Cause Found: Order Issued Judicial Officer: Hooper, David -MAG Order Signed: 10/07/2025
10/07/2025	Order Granting State's Motion For Greater Than Standard Bond Judicial Officer: Hooper, David -MAG Order Signed: 10/07/2025
10/07/2025	Party To Be Held In Custody No Bond Hold until Initial Hearing, then $2,000.00 Cash Bond Judicial Officer: Hooper, David -MAG Party: Beecher, Patricia Order Signed: 10/07/2025
10/07/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Initial Hearing scheduled for 10/08/2025 at 9:00 AM.
10/08/2025	Initial Hearing Session: 10/08/2025 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D Result: Commenced and concluded
10/08/2025	Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties Order Granting ---- 10/7/2025 : Patricia Beecher Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 10/7/2025 : Patricia Beecher
10/08/2025	Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Order Granting ---- 10/7/2025 : Ryan Wilson Mears Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 10/7/2025 : Ryan Wilson Mears
10/08/2025	Indigent Counsel Appointed at Court Expense
10/08/2025	Motion for Early Trial Filed Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/08/2025
10/08/2025	Order Granting Motion for Early Trial Fast & Speedy: 12/17/25 Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D Order Signed: 10/08/2025
10/08/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Initial Hearing scheduled for 10/14/2025 at 1:00 PM.
10/08/2025	Video Hearing Information D23 VHI Information Your hearing will be held remotely. Follow these instructions to access your REMOTE Court hearing. Phone number to Dial 1-844- 992-4726 meeting number 2334 308 4648. You may also join by going to WebEx.comhttps://mscourts.webex.com/meet/msc-cr-d23 2334 308 4648
10/08/2025	Administrative Event MINUTE SHEET
10/09/2025	Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 10/8/2025 : Patricia Beecher Video Hearing Information ---- 10/8/2025 : Patricia Beecher
10/09/2025	Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 10/8/2025 : Ryan Wilson Mears Video Hearing Information ---- 10/8/2025 : Ryan Wilson Mears
10/10/2025	Initial Hearing Session: 10/14/2025 1:00 PM, Rescheduled Session: 10/10/2025 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D Result: Commenced and concluded
10/10/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Initial Hearing originally scheduled on 10/14/2025 at 1:00 PM was rescheduled to 10/10/2025 at 9:00 AM. Reason: Court's Own Motion.
10/10/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Pretrial Conference scheduled for 10/20/2025 at 1:00 PM.
10/10/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Final PreTrial Hearing/Conference scheduled for 12/10/2025 at 9:00 AM.
10/10/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Early Trial scheduled for 12/15/2025 at 8:30 AM.
10/10/2025	Advisement of Rights Conducted Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D
10/10/2025	Indigent Counsel Appointed at Court Expense
10/10/2025	Omnibus Date 11-24-25
10/10/2025	Court Sets Bond vacate no bond hold; court set bond $1,000 cash Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D Party: Beecher, Patricia
10/10/2025	Motion for Early Trial Filed Filed By: Beecher, Patricia File Stamp: 10/10/2025
10/10/2025	Order Granting Motion for Early Trial 70th day 12-19-25 Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D Order Signed: 10/10/2025
10/10/2025	Court Order - Own Motion witness conflict date 10-31-25 discovery deadline 11-21-25 by noon Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D
10/10/2025	Appearance Filed Appearance For Party: Beecher, Patricia File Stamp: 10/10/2025
10/10/2025	Administrative Event Courtroom Minutes
10/11/2025	Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 10/10/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Ryan Wilson Mears Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 10/10/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Ryan Wilson Mears Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 10/10/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Ryan Wilson Mears Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 10/10/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Ryan Wilson Mears
10/20/2025	Pretrial Conference Session: 10/20/2025 1:00 PM, Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D Result: Commenced and concluded
10/20/2025	Court Order - Own Motion future court date remains 12/10/25 @9am Judicial Officer: Salinas, Jose D
10/21/2025	Administrative Event COURTROOM MINUTES 10/20/25
10/29/2025	Discovery Filed Discovery, Initial (Muni) Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/29/2025
10/29/2025	Discovery Filed BWC Discovery Compliance Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/29/2025
10/29/2025	Temporary/Limited Scope Appearance Filed Appearance Form For Party: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/29/2025
11/24/2025	Motion Filed Motion for Change of Plea Hearing Filed By: Beecher, Patricia File Stamp: 11/24/2025
11/25/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Change of Plea Hearing scheduled for 12/01/2025 at 1:00 PM.
11/26/2025	Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 11/25/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Hugh Walton Ronald;Ryan Wilson Mears
11/26/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Change of Plea Hearing originally scheduled on 12/01/2025 at 1:00 PM was rescheduled to 12/01/2025 at 9:00 AM. Reason: Court's Own Motion.
11/27/2025	Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 11/26/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Hugh Walton Ronald;Ryan Wilson Mears
12/01/2025	Change of Plea Hearing Session: 12/01/2025 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Christ, John -M Result: Commenced and concluded
12/01/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Change of Plea Hearing scheduled for 12/03/2025 at 9:00 AM.
12/02/2025	Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 12/1/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Hugh Walton Ronald;Ryan Wilson Mears
12/03/2025	Change of Plea Hearing Session: 12/03/2025 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Christ, John -M Result: Commenced and concluded
12/03/2025	Plea Agreement Filed Plea Agreement Filed By: Beecher, Patricia Filed Stamp: 12/03/2025
12/03/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Early Trial scheduled for 12/15/2025 at 8:30 AM was cancelled. Reason: Judicial Action.
12/03/2025	Hearing Scheduling Activity Final PreTrial Hearing/Conference scheduled for 12/10/2025 at 9:00 AM was cancelled. Reason: Judicial Action.
12/03/2025	Report to Probation
12/03/2025	Motion to Enter Plea Pursuant to Plea Agreement Filed Filed By: Beecher, Patricia Filed By: Heugel, Chad Jakob Daniel File Stamp: 12/03/2025
12/03/2025	Order Granting Mot. to Enter Plea Pursuant to Plea Agreement Order Granting Motion to Enter Plea of Guilty Pursuant to Plea Agreement. Judicial Officer: Christ, John -M Order Signed: 12/03/2025
12/03/2025	Court Finds Defendant Indigent as to Fines and Costs
12/03/2025	Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Judicial Officer: Christ, John -M Order Signed: 12/03/2025
12/03/2025	Judgment Judicial Officer: Christ, John -M 01. 35-42-2-1(c)(1)/F6: Battery Against a Public Safety Official • Plea by Agreement 02. 35-44.1-3-1(a)(1)/MA: Resisting Law Enforcmnt: def. knowingly/intentionally forcibly resist/obstruct • Dismissed 03. 35-44.1-3-1(a)(3)/MA: Resisting Law Enforcement def. knowingly or intentionally flees from law enfo • Dismissed 04. 35-45-1-3(a)(1)/MB: Disorderly Conduct: engages in fighting or tumultuous conduct • Dismissed
12/03/2025	Sentenced Judicial Officer: Christ, John -M 1.  35-42-2-1(c)(1)/F6: Battery Against a Public Safety Official Confinement to Commence: 12/03/2025 County Jail Term:  720 Days Jail Credit:  57 Days Suspended:  606 Days Consecutive with Prior Sentence:  49d232503cm008263 Comment:  time served no ams Condition - Adult: 1.  Abstract: Recommended Degree of Security - No Recommendation, 12/03/2025, Active 12/03/2025 2.  Probation, 606 days probation random testing probation to become kiosk reporting upon successful completion of all terms. probation user fee $25 initial $5 monthly. $5 per test, 12/03/2025, Active 12/03/2025 3.  Substance Abuse Evaluation, through voa, 12/03/2025, Active 12/03/2025 4.  Stay Away Order, Citgo Gas Station 4415 E. Washington St. Indianapolis, IN 46201, 12/03/2025, Active 12/03/2025
12/03/2025	Disposition Sent Electronically to Indiana State Police Added By CHRIS Interface (DISP)
12/03/2025	Administrative Event COURT MINUTES
12/04/2025	Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 12/3/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Hugh Walton Ronald;Ryan Wilson Mears Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 12/3/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Hugh Walton Ronald;Ryan Wilson Mears Sentenced ---- 12/3/2025 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Hugh Walton Ronald;Ryan Wilson Mears
12/04/2025	Clerk Administrative Event COURT MINUTES
12/10/2025	CANCELED Final PreTrial Hearing/Conference Reason: Judicial Action Session: 12/10/2025 9:00 AM, Cancelled
12/15/2025	CANCELED Early Trial Reason: Judicial Action
12/19/2025	Memorandum/Brief Filed Memorandum Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 12/19/2025
12/22/2025	Order Granting probation memo: transfer supervision; retain jurisdiction Judicial Officer: Christ, John -M Noticed: Beecher, Patricia Order Signed: 12/22/2025
12/23/2025	Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties Order Granting ---- 12/22/2025 : Patricia Beecher
02/26/2026	Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information Exclusion Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 02/26/2026
02/26/2026	Notice of Violation of Probation Violation of Probation Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 02/26/2026
03/02/2026	Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Issued
07/11/2026	Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Served
07/11/2026	Court Sets Bond $300 cash Party: Beecher, Patricia
07/11/2026	Hearing Scheduling Activity Hearing on Violation of Probation scheduled for 07/14/2026 at 9:00 AM.
07/12/2026	Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Hearing Scheduling Activity ---- 7/11/2026 : Chad Jakob Daniel Heugel;Hugh Walton Ronald;Ryan Wilson Mears
07/14/2026	Hearing on Violation of Probation Session: 07/14/2026 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Christ, John -M