Test
Test
to do list
cases
in re chico
beech grove
bmv
marion county election board
signs fines press badge voter ID
carroll county signs.
Hendrix county signs, terry judy details
Community East
Mighty aka Dennis Dewight Washington Jr. 93 aka
Michelle Rhotan Russell
people who have stolen from me:
newark bike check guy, jail.
John ripley st small claims
long haired guy hair cut off
lonnie hall, 120 years, has done 25 so far.
Jordan dennison doing 3 years for armed robbery
michelle russell broken spleen, evicted, house burned.
mighty doing 3 years.
Mark smith evicted Ken Hall evicted
Lydia Bailey ?
Issues in dog case
notice.
Collusion w extortionist
bad faith prosecution
perjury by only witness
withheld evidence
obstructed jury trial
attorneys held to higher standard
obstructed appointment of counsel
obstructed continuance
tried to rush to judgment prior to discovery
obstructed testimony about provocation, a key element of her case.
Said the armed threats were not relevant to showing provocation.
Here, she was colluding with a person who threatened D with a gun in an extortion racket. He was seeking $100, she was seeking $1000.
She sought to bar testimony exposing the scheme.
Lawyers have a duty of civility.
Lawyers have a duty of candor to the court.
Prosecutors have additional ethical and moral duties and are not to zealously win aall costs. These ethical duties continue to apply when a quasi criminal case is labeled as a civil matter. Perhpas this is conduct prejudicial to the adminstration of justice.
Additionally, she has a supervisor, name unknown, who should have trained and supervised her to avoid all this possible misconduct apparent misconduct. That failure might implicate a duty of competence.
We do not assume she directly collaborated in this matter with the mayor, a Joseph Hogsett, also a lawyer.
Here, she harmed the reputation of the dog, Chico, threatening its life as an unisurable liability. This harmed its guardian, causing harm to reputation and perhaps
some emotional distress.
Conflict between defendant and the purjuring witness has continued. They have each assualted each other, and he continues to provoke and threaten defendnat and his roommate Dawn Young, who he denied knowing on the stand.
My name is ___.
I walk Chico several times a week. I was not a direct witness, but have some 2nd hand awareness of the facts of the case. I am not familiar with the indiana rules of professional behavior for lawyers, so I am referring this matter to you as possibly something you would want to look into.
This is one case. She has many. My concern is that her actions might be leading to the death of loved dogs by those without the resources to resist her tricks at trial, all without due process of law. While it troubling that any citizens of our town might be conspiring to have dogs killed without due course of law to their owners or guardians, it is worse if they hide such actions behind their status as an attorney.
Sincerely, x.
Here, respondent could mitiagte damages by apologizing to Chico, and agreeing to drop the appeal.