Task list for Monday 5/6/24
Respond to both richards.
Move stuff to storage.
X 327 s oxford
Lawyer re title company
Kate flood! Email?
Get a cricket phone.
Did not do any of that. Now tuesday.
Tuesday did list:
=
New counterclaim
Gupta and H + H are violating my civil rights by attempting a taking in violation of due course of law. + 5th A + article i section which is is, 16, 17 and ?
It is clearly established that H + H and its staff can be subject to liability under 42 usc 1942. Cite talovski. Text of statute, then list elements, color of state law etc.
Gupta and a John Doe, hereinafter “Washington”, conspired together to violate my civil rights. I had emailed Gupta a notice to have her staff stop trespassing on my property; that they would need a warrant or invitation. She had a duty to inform Washington, and anyone else working for her intending to enter the property in relation to the case in which she was lead counsel. Washington was uninvited, either verbally or in writing. He did not ask for or receive consent to enter the property. I did not resist his entry. We had a civil conversation about the status of the case. Footnote 1. I regret having sent an early draft of that notice. I had planned to edit it the next day, but was short on time. What I sent was uncivil. Nonetheless, it is effective as a notice to refrain from trespass.
His employer, H + H, is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. This applies to the trespassing claim, but does not apply to the 1983 claim.
Washington’s discussion with me, intended to obtain compliance with the H + H’s agenda, was an ex parte contact. If authorized by Gupta, it violates my rights to due process under the 14th A and due course of law.
Some of the facts at this stage are unknown, and documents which are communications between Gupta and Washington may be privileged and difficult to discover.
Still, the allegation is sufficient to meet Twombly/Iqbal. A reasonable jury could conclude that washington physically invaded my land w o a warrant, acting fursuant to direction by Gupta. , stating a claim for trespassing, fourth a violation, section 11 violation, due course of law violation, etc.
3 the act of trespass by washington was one more example of unclean hands by h + h.
=
Monday goals. Get something ready tonight to file tomorrow. Do signs first, so head to kinkos now.
So how am i doing on my anti-gupta agenda?
1, counterclaims. Drafted but not filed.
2. File federal complaint against inspector. X
3. Crossclaim against washington
4. Crossclaim against gupta
5. Sue the clerk. Not yet filed.
[ ] hey i need to email andy horning
6. Sue other counties, collect legal fees. Not yet filed.
[hey i need to get to kinkos when they open-]
[tsla pre-market?]
7 how about prepare ethics complaint for fec weintraub? Then feed it to trump factions. We warned her hands off the internet, but did she listen? Nooooooooo…… so now the internet could come for her. Plan: meet w pilf guy.
Subplan: wasn’t i already looking up new york state rules for this stuff? Do i have a memo on it?
Subplan: alert senator young about rust problem
Maybe short article on rust case.
Heh heh, short arrticle on weintraub complaint.
Subplan: meet w pilf guy re co counsel in other states!
8. Brought to you by fire gupta campaign.
9. Hire Susie Talevski. Provide rob king info.
10. My next special will be called “Fire Gupta”.
11. [Global thermonuclear war.](redacted)
12. Hire susie talevski. Oh! And offer to be a source for her lawsuit. I authorize that lawyer guy to discuss the conversation we had, with susie t. Rob king. 22 e washington.
10. My next special will be called “Fire Gupta”.
I’m a standup comedian. An open miker, not someone who makes a living at it. I work with a producer and editor to make internet content. His videos have recieved a total of over 1 million hits on youtube. When he is in Indiana, he stays at the house in question. United Breaks Guitars is an example (also a book) of how the internet can be used to fight back.
To: Mr. Rob King 22 e washington st. cc: susie talevski.
Hi Rob. You may recall that we met several years ago in reference to the Burkhardt case, in which H + H executives went to jail over mismanagement. I am writing to waive my privilege of that conversation and related emails and ask you to share your recollections with Susie Talevski, a Valpararaiso lawyer who is investigating the death of her father.
This will help to establish that my concerns about rights violations by h + h are not something i came up with this year, but are longstanding.
Thank you in advance.
