To do:
Write to Bopp in re campaign fine cases/
John England.
Wayne Kirk.
this is not a public blog, just a place hwere i can leave myself notes. nothing to see here folks, move along.
Thursday, February 19, 2004
Wednesday, February 18, 2004
Sunday, February 15, 2004
did:
might get erik a unicorn gig. gave him an audition. rachel's friend.
negotiated with joell about house; he doesn't want it.
orren, who is dating __, offered to become my intern.
worked 1 hr on majors v iec.
found file, reread complaint
two hours on majors abell.
added links to majors.blog,research at findlaw and google.
packed boxes for 1 1/2 hours.
might get erik a unicorn gig. gave him an audition. rachel's friend.
negotiated with joell about house; he doesn't want it.
orren, who is dating __, offered to become my intern.
worked 1 hr on majors v iec.
found file, reread complaint
two hours on majors abell.
added links to majors.blog,research at findlaw and google.
packed boxes for 1 1/2 hours.
Saturday, February 14, 2004
did: called mom. called brooke. wrote a draft of 2003 report, which will need more work. made a to-do list. yesterday i did laundry.
to do:
find place to live
mike schaefer
belt for mower
fuses
update financial records
fix n key..new keyboard?
billing records
write to mom, lindy
package to lindy
call re detist 278-2075
pack up apartment
credit card on autopay
car insurance
house insurance
car insurance claim
when are lp meetings?
CLE crisis
apply cato job
apply jaguar guy's food warehouse job.
plan toset up pay site
deal ww vacant lad titles
campaig fine situation
make better list
make dtl,weekly tl,monthly, yearly.
keppersonal journal 1 line per day
revise, send, annual report.
to do:
find place to live
mike schaefer
belt for mower
fuses
update financial records
fix n key..new keyboard?
billing records
write to mom, lindy
package to lindy
call re detist 278-2075
pack up apartment
credit card on autopay
car insurance
house insurance
car insurance claim
when are lp meetings?
CLE crisis
apply cato job
apply jaguar guy's food warehouse job.
plan toset up pay site
deal ww vacant lad titles
campaig fine situation
make better list
make dtl,weekly tl,monthly, yearly.
keppersonal journal 1 line per day
revise, send, annual report.
Saturday, February 07, 2004
Job Opportunities at Cato
Positions Available as of February 3, 2004:
Email: mlampman@cato.org
Mailroom Manager
The Cato Institute is seeking a mailroom manager. The person in this position will sort and distribute all incoming and outgoing mail, packages, and deliveries; maintain proper inventory levels in the mailroom, bookroom, and other storage areas; keep storage areas clean and properly organized; and assist the facilities manager when required. Excellent organizational skills required. Mailroom experience strongly desired.
David Lampo
Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20001
Fax (202) 842-3490
Positions Available as of February 3, 2004:
Email: mlampman@cato.org
Mailroom Manager
The Cato Institute is seeking a mailroom manager. The person in this position will sort and distribute all incoming and outgoing mail, packages, and deliveries; maintain proper inventory levels in the mailroom, bookroom, and other storage areas; keep storage areas clean and properly organized; and assist the facilities manager when required. Excellent organizational skills required. Mailroom experience strongly desired.
David Lampo
Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20001
Fax (202) 842-3490
Mike, I called your office in July in reference to Williamson v Long and Majors v IEC, and we spoke about this in August, and I left you a message in December, but I still have not heard from you. I am aware that the commission had a closed meeting in December. Perhaps at that time they reached a decision on my settlement offer which has been outstanding since 2/2002, or is it 2001. Time is of the essense. Please let me know the status of the case, and how you want to handle it. My offer is withdrawn if I have not received any response within 30 days of your reciept of this letter. My clients continue to prefer settlement over litigation, but we need to move forward on this. If you wish to authorize me to discuss this directly with counsel for the commission that would be fine. I'm aware that I'm hard to reach, maybe we've just had a failure to communicate. My email, arbitraryaardvark @ themail.com, and my voicemail are both unreliable, so please respond in writing to 227 N Temple 46201 soonest.
Also, I am writing to confirm our conversation in August that we have discussed the issue of whether my previous status as your client creates a conflict, and decided that it doesn't.
- Robbin.
cc:Rutherford
Also, I am writing to confirm our conversation in August that we have discussed the issue of whether my previous status as your client creates a conflict, and decided that it doesn't.
- Robbin.
cc:Rutherford
call lindy and mom, draft letter to mom
letter to alisa
6:47 am 2/7/04
Dear Ms. Cohen.
About a month ago, I went to your office to request an appointment.
It is my policy never to sue a government agency without first meeting and attempting to resolve the situation informally.
You refused to meet with me.
Your flunkies refused to give me their names.
My written request for a hearing was denied.
At a minimum, your conduct was uncivil; it was rude.
I became furious, and after a cooling off period remain upset and concerned.
I suspect,although I am not certain, that when the government agents under your supervision refused to identify themselves, they committed either a breach of professional ethics, or misfeasance/malfeasance in office, or both.
When government employees hide their identities, it is strongly suggestive that something nefarious is afoot.
It creates an appearance of impropriety.
It contributes to a situation in which driver's licenses are wrongfully withheld, and then payments are extorted to issue the licenses.
A driver's license implicates liberty rights to travel, to obtain employment, to gain access to a private club which has a liquor license..rephrase.
Some of the consequences of the wrongful denial of license renewal included interference with the right to travel, the right to seek employment, access to federal court, access to a cultural performance at the vogue, access to a private club i have belonged to for 8 years.
The refusal to replace a stolen driver's license contradicts the public policy expressed in the victim's rights provisions of the Indiana constitution.
On my next trip to a BMV office, my rights under the 1974 privacy act as amended, were violated, when the clerk insisted that i give a ssn,
whie refusing to show any written authority for the demand, and refusing to give any statement as to how the information would be used.
The denial of a hearing on the denial of driver's license renewal is three things:
it's a crime,a federal felony under is it 18 usc 241,
a tort, actionable under 42 usc 1983 et seq., and an ethical violation of your duties to uphold the state and federal constitution.
You have been knowingly participating in this pattern and practice of illegal rights deprivation. While you have counseled against such policies, you failed to resign or take other steps to avoid participating in the conspiracy to violate my rights.
Was this wise?
One of my clients says you are good people, and my initial research
supports this, and I am inclined to try to work things out, if we can.
But when I went to try to work things out, I was treated with contempt and distain by employees under your supervision and control.
I want their names. So far, I don't have theirs, but I have yours.
I want a written apology from them.
I want assurances that the policy of concealing identities will end, as of now, and that when I request an appointment I'll be given one.
And, maybe, I want a shrubbery, if the ficus is still available.
If not, a token cash payment would suffice.
Typically, I find that letters like this are ignored, at first,
and I have to beat people in court or at the ballot box or over the head with a trout before I get their attention.
But it is my policy to give fair warning before going to war.
I have mad skillz. I am trained as a journalist, lawyer, politican, and shambala warrior.
This is the third warning to your agency, and my first warning to you personally.
Can we work this out?
Cordially,
Robbin Stewart.
letter to marion co election board
Dan,
Here's the situation.
You, along with Mr Vane and the county election board, extorted $600
from John England, in violation of his civil rights. This was three things, a crime, a tort, and an ethical violation.
I suggest your promptly return his $600 with a nice letter of apology.
Likewise, I suggest you cease and desist from attempting to extort a further $400 from John, $1000 from my client wayne kirk, and anyone else similarly situated.
As you know, Joell Palmer is my client in Taylor v Taylor, in which you are opposing counsel. And yet, rather than communicating with him via his counsel of record, you communicated with him directly, first threatening him with a $600 fine, then assessing a $50 fine, and finally dropping the matter. While in the end Mr. Palmer was not fined after all, he experienced distress as a result of you letters, and there was a chilling affect on his rights of politial participation uder the state and federal constitutions.
If you have been at all diligent, you are also aware that Mr. Palmer is a plaintiff in Williamson v. Long, on precisely this issue of law.
And you may recall that Mr. Palmer was a plaintiff in Edmondson v. Indianapolis, in which he was awarded $10,000 in damges and $100,000 in legal fees.
I am sure that you appreciate that communicating directly with a party who is represented by counsel is a non-trivial breach of professional ethics. If I am wrong on either the facts or the rules, please let me know.
I'm told you are very busy. You might find that the simplest way to resolve this is to send me a check for $600, made out to John England, and a letter withdrawing your threats against England, Kirk, and Palmer.
Alternatively, I'd be happy to meet for coffee and kick this around a bit.
Perhaps we've just had a failure to communicate.
I will be writing separately concerning the theft and seizure of signs from my client Eric Barnes, in the recent Lawrence election.
Cordially,
Robbin Stewart.
outline of annual report
letter to mike schaefer
look for places to live
get headlight
letter to alisa
6:47 am 2/7/04
Dear Ms. Cohen.
About a month ago, I went to your office to request an appointment.
It is my policy never to sue a government agency without first meeting and attempting to resolve the situation informally.
You refused to meet with me.
Your flunkies refused to give me their names.
My written request for a hearing was denied.
At a minimum, your conduct was uncivil; it was rude.
I became furious, and after a cooling off period remain upset and concerned.
I suspect,although I am not certain, that when the government agents under your supervision refused to identify themselves, they committed either a breach of professional ethics, or misfeasance/malfeasance in office, or both.
When government employees hide their identities, it is strongly suggestive that something nefarious is afoot.
It creates an appearance of impropriety.
It contributes to a situation in which driver's licenses are wrongfully withheld, and then payments are extorted to issue the licenses.
A driver's license implicates liberty rights to travel, to obtain employment, to gain access to a private club which has a liquor license..rephrase.
Some of the consequences of the wrongful denial of license renewal included interference with the right to travel, the right to seek employment, access to federal court, access to a cultural performance at the vogue, access to a private club i have belonged to for 8 years.
The refusal to replace a stolen driver's license contradicts the public policy expressed in the victim's rights provisions of the Indiana constitution.
On my next trip to a BMV office, my rights under the 1974 privacy act as amended, were violated, when the clerk insisted that i give a ssn,
whie refusing to show any written authority for the demand, and refusing to give any statement as to how the information would be used.
The denial of a hearing on the denial of driver's license renewal is three things:
it's a crime,a federal felony under is it 18 usc 241,
a tort, actionable under 42 usc 1983 et seq., and an ethical violation of your duties to uphold the state and federal constitution.
You have been knowingly participating in this pattern and practice of illegal rights deprivation. While you have counseled against such policies, you failed to resign or take other steps to avoid participating in the conspiracy to violate my rights.
Was this wise?
One of my clients says you are good people, and my initial research
supports this, and I am inclined to try to work things out, if we can.
But when I went to try to work things out, I was treated with contempt and distain by employees under your supervision and control.
I want their names. So far, I don't have theirs, but I have yours.
I want a written apology from them.
I want assurances that the policy of concealing identities will end, as of now, and that when I request an appointment I'll be given one.
And, maybe, I want a shrubbery, if the ficus is still available.
If not, a token cash payment would suffice.
Typically, I find that letters like this are ignored, at first,
and I have to beat people in court or at the ballot box or over the head with a trout before I get their attention.
But it is my policy to give fair warning before going to war.
I have mad skillz. I am trained as a journalist, lawyer, politican, and shambala warrior.
This is the third warning to your agency, and my first warning to you personally.
Can we work this out?
Cordially,
Robbin Stewart.
letter to marion co election board
Dan,
Here's the situation.
You, along with Mr Vane and the county election board, extorted $600
from John England, in violation of his civil rights. This was three things, a crime, a tort, and an ethical violation.
I suggest your promptly return his $600 with a nice letter of apology.
Likewise, I suggest you cease and desist from attempting to extort a further $400 from John, $1000 from my client wayne kirk, and anyone else similarly situated.
As you know, Joell Palmer is my client in Taylor v Taylor, in which you are opposing counsel. And yet, rather than communicating with him via his counsel of record, you communicated with him directly, first threatening him with a $600 fine, then assessing a $50 fine, and finally dropping the matter. While in the end Mr. Palmer was not fined after all, he experienced distress as a result of you letters, and there was a chilling affect on his rights of politial participation uder the state and federal constitutions.
If you have been at all diligent, you are also aware that Mr. Palmer is a plaintiff in Williamson v. Long, on precisely this issue of law.
And you may recall that Mr. Palmer was a plaintiff in Edmondson v. Indianapolis, in which he was awarded $10,000 in damges and $100,000 in legal fees.
I am sure that you appreciate that communicating directly with a party who is represented by counsel is a non-trivial breach of professional ethics. If I am wrong on either the facts or the rules, please let me know.
I'm told you are very busy. You might find that the simplest way to resolve this is to send me a check for $600, made out to John England, and a letter withdrawing your threats against England, Kirk, and Palmer.
Alternatively, I'd be happy to meet for coffee and kick this around a bit.
Perhaps we've just had a failure to communicate.
I will be writing separately concerning the theft and seizure of signs from my client Eric Barnes, in the recent Lawrence election.
Cordially,
Robbin Stewart.
outline of annual report
letter to mike schaefer
look for places to live
get headlight
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)