https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEhYhV_3njaljCBkqaANuESg3c1qSriEQOhNQ-ETonbR69Licq6cCe5etVLPN11SXFebfJGyc7czybDrKS-6z6UskFrpXAy6H5zteZqC29c7XDTzodcGwJ-rL2JG8FhS7PD8ufxdgEVbMCVoDF9OFzgdQiYAt7otcCbj_4HEZkGT5XkBSy0teLQ=s1280

onboard with upshift Monday, February 28, 2022 12:00pm - 1:00pm EST 2345 S. Lynhurst Drive, Suite 214, Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 pay electric bill $250. check surplus sale. today: plasma sample someday: letter to hq of biolife plasma http://explorer.helium.com possible income stream. buy antenna, get paid small sun monthly. yesterday notes: stripcreator is down so i wasn't able to make comic: didnt get much done tuesday. worked 4-10. called plasma center but didnt go in. dived the usual spot. checked out street behind the club. little free library there needs some books. bought gas $28. 3.25, cheaper elsewhere. i don't remember if i did anything else. my computer from parexel came. plan for today: plasma. goodwill? chase, cash check, pay electric bill, so find electric bill. can't find. wednesday. got blood test at plasma center. construction made it hard to get to chase so didnt. could not pay electric bill without the electric bill. was late to work, lost track of time. did not make it to goodwill. worked 5 hours, did th edishes by myself, slow enough day. no break, my back hurts, but i coped better than last time. didn't get anything else done. stocks lower again. oh went up while i was at work! friday: paid water bill $100. moved $500 from tommy's account, my first paycheck. find electric bill x, pay electric bill, chase.

so far today i

plasma +$60.

worked on the brief

scrap yard +$12.

dolla tree $7. bought food containers.

found a $300 check.

got my social security card for work

time to go to work now - thought i had an hour.

to do

bank to sign up for paylocity.

clean stairs

work on brief

plant stuff?

plaintiff-appellants complain that as to the disclaimer provisions, the opinion below is unsupported by law and is at odds with, for example, nifla v becerra. they are correct as a matter of law, so it would take a ruling by this court to affirm the policy choices of the court below. Shortly after Talley v California, there has been a deep split in authority, with most cases following Talley, but a significant minority allowing compelled disclaimers of campaign speech due to state's strong preferences for the public's "right to know" the sources of campaign speech, perhaps out of a concern that speech by the rich would distort the political process. In Citizens United, Part IV, the court embraced these concerns, praising disclaimer rules 8-1. This has confused lower courts, widening the split in authority, since Citizens on this point directly contradicts cases such as Buckley ACLF. This case presents a good vehicle to resolve the confusion, and make a choice whether to follow the Citizens United dicta, or the line of compelled speech cases beginning at Barnett through Talley McIntyre ACLF (illinois union case) NIFLA. In Bonta, the court announced a new standard of review, toughening the permissive Buckley v Valeo test for disclosures. The court below applied the Bonta standard to disclaimers as well. This is a point worth reviewing. In Bonta, the court heightened scrutiny of political speech funded by the Koch machine. In the instant case, the Bonta standard could be used to relax scrutiny, as an alternative to what Justice Scalia dissenting in McIntyre called a kiss-of-death standard. This issue is not rare or obscure. Many of the states listed in Scalia's footnote 2 in McIntyre continue to have disclaimer statutes. The FEC requires a disclaimer for signs and literature in federal races. Congress is considering legislation to extend these disclaimers to internet ads. After its CEO was hauled before congress, Facebook began requiring disclaimers, without a direct state action link. The vast majority of campaign signs in state and local elections contain disclaimers, under an impression that they are required by law. Rhode island would go further, requiring a disclaimer of the top 5 donors. Citizens United, Part IV, was dicta, was limited to corporations, was a less restricitive means than a complete ban, so it does not cover Rhode Island's statute. If the court continues to support the policy choices it praised in Citizens United, this case is a good vehicle to do so in a holding, perhaps under the new Bonta standard. At least since FEC v McConnell, this area of law has been one of indeterminacy, where states and courts are not sure what the law is. This should be resolved one way or the other. Therefore, certiorari should be granted. The district court, the Amicus Campaign Legal Center, and the circuit court each praised the legislature's policy choices, in choosing to uphold the statute, although in doing so they ignored or mistated controlling cases such as Talley, McIntyre, Wooley v Maynard, ACLF, Town of Gilbert, Janus, and NIFLA. Only this court has the power and authority to change the law to adopt these policy choices. For every Williams v Rhodes, there is a Jenness v Fortson. The court has never held that the First Amendment is absolute. In cases like Burdick v Takushi, Clingman v Beaver, Twin Cities Area New Party, and Crawford v Marion County Election Board, the court has allowed states some breathing room in which to regulate elections, even if this imposed some burdens on First Amendment rights. Rhode Island asks for similar breathing room. There are important constitutional values on both sides of the dispute. The court takes about 80 cases out of about 8,000 petitions for cert. This case should be one of those 80. To resolve a long standing split, to inform the FEC and congress, to explore the new Bonta standard, and to protect the integrity of the election process, at a time when elections are seen as under attack. The danger the state sees is dark money distorting elections. The danger plaintiffs see is chilling of core political speech. The dispute is worthy of the court's limited time. (ending here for now 2:30 friday 2/25/22) the courts below upheld disclosure and disclaimer regulation. the disclosure case is relatively uncontroversial, but the disclaimer issue is a close question. this court's prior precedents do not support the conclusions, and further action by this court would be needed. This case presents the important question of whether to relax the standard of review in disclaimer cases, and allow rhode island to impose criminal sanctions for resisting compelled speech. a recent texas case about on-premise billboards called into question town of gilbert v reed's holding that sign cases always get strict scrutiny when, as here, they are content based. the first question is whether the first circuit correctly used the new bonta standard rather than traditional strict scrutiny. the second question is whether the result of its bonta analysis was correct. if yes, this case represents a bookend, with bonta on one end and this case on the other. discussion of amicus brief by campaign legal center discussion of lower court ruling discussion of first circuit decision discussion of citizens united. discussion of scalia dissent in mcintyre. lower court ruling: Gaspee Project v. Mederos, 482 F. Supp. 3d 11, 13 (D.R.I. 2020) (“The avowed governmental purpose for these requirements is for an electorate that is informed and aware of who or what is spending money in its elections. It is for the Court to determine whether this state interest is sufficiently important to impose the Act's burdens on political speech and whether those burdens are substantially related to achieving that end.”) The avowed governmental purpose for these requirements is for an electorate that is informed and aware of who or what is spending money in its elections. It is for the Court to determine whether this state interest is sufficiently important to impose the Act's burdens on political speech and whether those burdens are substantially related to achieving that end Gaspee Project v. Mederos, 482 F. Supp. 3d 11, 13 (D.R.I. 2020) This includes a message stating "I am ___(name of entity's chief executive officer or equivalent), and ___ (title) of ____ (entity), and I approved its content." https://casetext.com/case/gaspee-project-v-mederos must include on the communication a list of their top five donors during the one-year period prior to the date of the communication. But while "[d]isclaimer and disclosure requirements may burden the ability to speak, ... they ‘impose no ceiling on campaign-related activities ... and ‘do not prevent anyone from speaking.’ " Citizens United , 558 U.S. at 366, 130 S.Ct. 876 (quoting Buckley , 424 U.S. at 64, 96 S.Ct. 612 ; McConnell v. Federal Election Com'n , 540 U.S. 93, 201, 124 S.Ct. 619, 157 L.Ed.2d 491 (2003) ). Gaspee Project v. Mederos, 482 F. Supp. 3d 11, 16 (D.R.I. 2020) “Because disclosure and disclaimer laws are a "less restrictive alternative to more comprehensive regulations of speech," they are subject to "exacting scrutiny," a test that requires the Court to consider whether the law bears a "substantial relation" to a "sufficiently important" governmental interest. ” Gaspee Project v. Mederos, 482 F. Supp. 3d 11, 16 (D.R.I. 2020) The Board argues that the governmental interest at issue, an informed electorate, is achieved by the disclosure of who is financing political speech. This is an interest the Supreme Court has determined is sufficiently important with respect to disclosure and disclaimer laws. See Citizens United, 558 U.S. at 371, 130 S.Ct. 876 (holding that "disclosure permits citizens to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way ... [and] to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages"); Here the court relied on daluz and delaware strong, which were disclosure cases, not disclaimer cases. the court erroneously stated that citizens united had so held, but cu's discussion of disclaimers was dicta and not holding. it will take a further decision by this court to so hold. Indeed, "[i]n a republic where the people are sovereign, the ability of the citizenry to make informed choices among candidates for office is essential." NOM , 649 F.3d at 57 (quoting Buckley , 424 U.S. at 14-15, 96 S.Ct. 612 ). This informational interest, however, "is not limited to informing the choice between candidates for political office." Id. "As Citizens United recognized, there is an equally compelling interest in identifying the speakers behind politically oriented messages." Id. Gaspee Project v. Mederos, 482 F. Supp. 3d 11, 17 (D.R.I. 2020) "In an age characterized by the rapid multiplication of media outlets and the rise of internet reporting, the ‘marketplace of ideas’ has become flooded with a profusion of information and political messages. Citizens rely ever more on a message's source as a proxy for reliability and a barometer of political spin. Disclosing the identity and constituency of a speaker engaged in political speech thus ‘enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.’ " Gaspee Project v. Mederos, 482 F. Supp. 3d 11, 17 (D.R.I. 2020) The Act also furthers the state's "equally compelling interest in identifying the speakers behind politically oriented messages" by requiring those who spend more than $1,000 during that window to disclose [sic] their sponsorship on all electioneering communications, including—for 501(c)(3) and exempt nonprofits only—their top five donors. here the court confused disclosure and disclaimers, which historically have involved different levels of scrutiny. - notes saturday night: one of the major themes of the later 20th century is that the first amendment protects a right of privacy against state action. the cases include naacp v alabama, talley v california, bates v little rock, griswold v connecticut, roe v wade, doe v bolton. rhode island and the first circuit reject this view. texas and others are calling for the court to overturn roe. this case presents an opportunity for the court to discuss the first amendment right of privacy versus possibly compelling state interests in a context removed from the politics of the abortion issue. this is not a case that fits easily into a "liberal" or "conservative" characterization. the faction of the court most eager to undermine roe has tended to oppose censorship of political speech in cases like bonta, janus, becerra, town of gilbert, while roe's supporters often dissented in those cases. == work on the summary of argument part. 1. there is a deep split. this is a good vehicle. 2. citizens united created confusion which has left this area of law in state of indeterminacy, which the court should try to resolve one way or the other. 3. the first circuit was wrong on the law, but makes important policy arguments this court might choose to adopt. 4. a. is bonta the correct standard of review? b. did the court below correctly apply bonta? 5. rhode island seeks, indirectly, maybe inadvertantly, to overturn roe v wade, finding state interests to override any right to privacy. some on the court may welcome this prospect. 6. the statute is more narrowly tailored than those of california in talley and ohio in mcintyre. however it is more burdensome in some respects. if the court upholds the statute, it will send a signal to the states that they have wiggle room as laboratories of democracy to promote the public's "right to know" by criminalizing certain core political speech. there are important values on both sides of the controversy, which the first circuit did not adequately address. jenness v fortson, twin cities area new party, clingman v beaver, burdick v takushi, gobitis, chaplinski, crawford v. marion county election board, buckley v valeo. if the statute is to be upheld, it needs a better reasoned opinion, by the only court with the power to distinguish cases such as nifla and talley.

monday: to do x 0. plasma $100

x 1. finish taxes.

3. print off health records for woodstock club 2 copies.

x 2. bmv memo

x 4. what else? walmart for shoes? buy a clipboard.

5. x make better list. make a comic.

6. headlight. clean car. tie rods.

7. read brief. post to /r/law school about editing.

x 1/2 8. bank, get sample check.

9. parexel laptop.

10. https://freespeechlaw.scholasticahq.com/ redraft brief as law review article. x 11. post about spaulding trial. 12. delaware ago letter. 13. went to advance to check on core charge for battery, guy was not there. get wipers. 14. pnc logon can't, past due $27. 2 bmv memo. To: BMV hearing examiner CC: bmv counsel From: Robbin Stewart Re: Rescheduling hearing. matter # _. I request that the previous telephone hearing be rescheduled. I did not attend, but it was due to excusable neglect. What had happened was that I was in baltimore doing a medical study, but was unexpectedly discharged at the start of the second month. While checking out, I inadvertantly left my laptop behind. So far the site is refusing to return my laptop. I bought another one, this one, but for about a week I was not able to sign into the new device, so I could not access my email, calendar, etc., and did not have the phone code to dial into the hearing. Time is not of the essence. Respectfully submitted, Robbin Stewart.

Code Defect Description Severity Comments 138 Hair restraints Food employees not wearing proper hair restraint. Non-Critical Observed some employees work with food with no hair restraint. Provide and use an approved hair restraint. 171 (c) Minimize contact (Non-Critical) Bare hand contact not minimized with non ready to eat food(s). Non-Critical Ramekin noted inside the bulk containers of flour, starch and sugar in the dry storage area. Replace them with scoop with handles to reduce bare hand contact with food. 177 (a) 5 Uncovered foods (Critical) Foods are uncovered Non-Critical Observed open boxes of starch and flour in the dry storage area. Provide cover to prevent the contamination. 187 (a) (2) Cold holding Potentially hazardous cold foods not held at proper temperatures. Critical Lamb meat measured at 47 degrees F inside the cold top located in the ccook line. Employee stated that they brought it to the cold top from the WIC less than 1 hour ago. Transfer the meat to another cooler. All potentially hazardous cold holding foods should be maintained 41 degrees F at all times. 192 (a) Discarding datemarking Unmarked or expired food(s) not discarded. Critical Container of chicken salad dated on 10/3/2019 noted inside the reach in cooler located in the salad station. Discard the food 227 (a) Fixed equipment spacing/sealing Improper installation of fixed equipment and sealing. Non-Critical There is a gap between the hand sink and the wall in the kitchen prep area. Seal the hand sink to the wall. 295 (a) (b) Food contact surface(s) soiled Food contact surface(s) soiled. Critical Deli slicer located on the prep table in the kitchen is soiled. Cleana and sanitize after each use or every 4 hours. 417 (b) Storage of Personal Items Improper storage of personal item(s) with food or food contact item(s). Non-Critical Employee cell phone was stored on the prep table by the hand sink. Store personal items in designated areas. 431 (a) Walls, floors, etc/soiled Physical structure, walls, floors, and/or ceilings soiled. Non-Critical 1- Floor under the cooking equipment and hot boxes are soiled. Clean2- Celing above the hand sink in the prep area and dish machine room are heavily soiled. Clean 438 Toxic labeling Working container(s) of toxic materials not labeled with common name of contents. Critical No label provided on 3 spray bottle of chemicals with unknown blue and white liquids located under 3 bay sink and under hand sink located in the kitchen. Provide date mark with the name of content. Code Defect Description Severity Comments 438 Toxic labeling Working container(s) of toxic materials not labeled with common name of contents. Critical No label provided on 3 spray bottle of chemicals with unknown blue and white liquids located under 3 bay sink and under hand sink located in the kitchen. Provide date mark with the name of content. 439 Toxic material(s) separation Toxic material(s) improperly stored. Critical 1- Hand sanitizer was stored on the clean dish shelf. Store it away from food and food contact surfaces. Code Defect Description Severity Comments 138 Hair restraints Food employees not wearing proper hair restraint. Non-Critical Seared salmon stored below raw seafood in the low boy coolers on the cookline, store pre-cooked foods above raw proteins 171 (b) Bare hand contact (critical) Bare hand contact with ready to eat food. Critical Observed waitstaff handle crackers with their fingers to put in bread baskets, discontinue. Sous Chef addressed with server.First observation of bare hand contact, warning issued. 173 Cross-contamination Raw animal foods stored incorrectly over ready to eat foods and/or other raw foods. Critical Seared salmon stored below raw seafood in the low boy coolers on the cookline, store pre-cooked foods above raw proteins 196 Consumer advisory Establishment serving undercooked and/or raw animal product with no consumer advisory. Critical Menu with lamb, salmon, steaks, and other menu items that are cooked to order need a consumer advisory statement and a symbol to indicate which menu items are undercooked or raw----------------01/18/19 Recheck: Lamb chops are cooked to order and was not included with the consumer advisory reminder (asterisks) 199 Thawing Potentially hazardous food(s) thawing improperly. Non-Critical Frozen ROP mahi mahi filets thawing on a sheet tray on a speed rack. When thawing a vacuumed sealed fish product, must poke a hole or open the package for thawing, either under running water or under refrigeration 218 Equipment repair Equipment in need of repair. Non-Critical Dessert 2-door reach in cooler handle is broken and no longer smooth or cleanable, will need to replace handle. 234 In use utensil storage In use utensil(s) stored improperly. Non-Critical Knives and spatulas stored in sanitizer. Appropiate storage options include: in water at least 135 F, dry on a clean surface, or in the food with the handle up 334 Air gap-water supply Insufficient air gap between water inlet and flood level rim. Critical Dishmachine sprayer arms x 2 need to be elevated above the sink rim, currently hanging below the sink rim 345 (b) Hand sink improper usage Hand washing facility used for purposes other than hand washing. Critical Colander used in the bar hand sink, discontinue Code Defect Description Severity Comments 115 HACCP for reduced oxygen packaging No HACCP plan for reduced oxygen packaging. Non-Critical Establishment is ROPing various food items such as fish and cheese without a HACCP plan in place. Establishment shall cease all ROP operations. Proivde a HACCP plan to start ROPing again or do not ROP at all. 177 (a) 5 Uncovered foods (Critical) Foods are uncovered Non-Critical 1. Uncovered food items in the walk in freezer.2. Uncovered food items in both walk in coolers.3. Open bag of flour in dry storage area. Bag was closed during inspection.Cover all foods in containers or wrappings to prevent contamination.*This is a repeat violation. 177 (a) 5 Uncovered foods (Critical) Foods are uncovered Non-Critical 1. Uncovered food items in the walk in freezer.2. Uncovered food items in both walk in coolers.3. Open bag of flour in dry storage area. Bag was closed during inspection.Cover all foods in containers or wrappings to prevent contamination.*This is a repeat violation. 177 (a) 5 Uncovered foods (Critical) Foods are uncovered Non-Critical 1. Uncovered food items in the walk in freezer.2. Uncovered food items in both walk in coolers.3. Open bag of flour in dry storage area. Bag was closed during inspection.Cover all foods in containers or wrappings to prevent contamination.*This is a repeat violation. 187 (a) (2) Cold holding Potentially hazardous cold foods not held at proper temperatures. Critical Tuna salad ( 50.2*F) and herb butter (59.5*F) were not being held at proper cold holding temperatures of 41*F or below. Food items were moved into the walk in cooler. 191 Date marking Potentially hazardous ready-to-eat food not properly date marked. Critical 1. Foods not date marked in both the walk in coolers.2. Foods not date marked in both reach in cooler drawers on the cook line.Date mark all PHF ready to eat food products being held more then 24hrs.*This is a repeat violation. 234 In use utensil storage In use utensil(s) stored improperly. Non-Critical Plastic container being used as a scoop without handle was being stored inside the flour bag. Do not store in use utensils where they can contaminate food product. 239 (b) Improper storage of clean equipment Clean equipment and/or utensils stored incorrectly. Non-Critical Clean plastic containers were being stored on the floor in the dish machine area. Containers were moved during inspection and placed on racks. 242 Single-service reuse Single service and single use articles reused. Non-Critical Single service plastic container was being used as a scoop in the flour bag. Scoop was removed during inspection. Do not re-use single use items. 295 (c) Non food contact surface cleaning frequency Non-food contact surface(s) soiled. Non-Critical 1. Reach in freezer is soiled on the bottom shelf. Clean and sanitize. Code Defect Description Severity Comments 296 Food contact cleaning frequency Food contact surface(s) of equipment and/or utensils are not cleaned and sanitized between uses. Critical 1. Knife soiled on the knife rack in the kitchen area.2. Knife rack in the kitchen area soiled.3. Kitchen soiled on the knife rack in the bakery area.4. Knife rack in the bakery area soiled.Knives were removed from racks during inspection. Clean knives and knife racks. 5. Slicer soiled in the kitchen area.Clean and sanitize all food contact surfaces. 296 Food contact cleaning frequency Food contact surface(s) of equipment and/or utensils are not cleaned and sanitized between uses. Critical 1. Knife soiled on the knife rack in the kitchen area.2. Knife rack in the kitchen area soiled.3. Kitchen soiled on the knife rack in the bakery area.4. Knife rack in the bakery area soiled.Knives were removed from racks during inspection. Clean knives and knife racks. 5. Slicer soiled in the kitchen area.Clean and sanitize all food contact surfaces. 296 Food contact cleaning frequency Food contact surface(s) of equipment and/or utensils are not cleaned and sanitized between uses. Critical 1. Knife soiled on the knife rack in the kitchen area.2. Knife rack in the kitchen area soiled.3. Kitchen soiled on the knife rack in the bakery area.4. Knife rack in the bakery area soiled.Knives were removed from racks during inspection. Clean knives and knife racks. 5. Slicer soiled in the kitchen area.Clean and sanitize all food contact surfaces. 431 (a) Walls, floors, etc/soiled Physical structure, walls, floors, and/or ceilings soiled. Non-Critical 1. Mouse droppings found in dry storage and in the dish machine area. 2. Floors soiled in the kitchen under equipment, on the cook line, and at the floor wall junctures in all rooms of the establishment.3. Walls under the 3 bay sink and in the dry storage areas area soiled.3. Mop sink room floor soiled.Clean and maintain. 431 (a) Walls, floors, etc/soiled Physical structure, walls, floors, and/or ceilings soiled. Non-Critical 1. Mouse droppings found in dry storage and in the dish machine area. 2. Floors soiled in the kitchen under equipment, on the cook line, and at the floor wall junctures in all rooms of the establishment.3. Walls under the 3 bay sink and in the dry storage areas area soiled.3. Mop sink room floor soiled.Clean and maintain. 431 (a) Walls, floors, etc/soiled Physical structure, walls, floors, and/or ceilings soiled. Non-Critical 1. Mouse droppings found in dry storage and in the dish machine area. 2. Floors soiled in the kitchen under equipment, on the cook line, and at the floor wall junctures in all rooms of the establishment.3. Walls under the 3 bay sink and in the dry storage areas area soiled.3. Mop sink room floor soiled.Clean and maintain. 438 Toxic labeling Working container(s) of toxic materials not labeled with common name of contents. Critical Code Defect Description Severity Comments 173 Cross-contamination Raw animal foods stored incorrectly over ready to eat foods and/or other raw foods. Critical Raw shell eggs stored over 2 containers of sauce, one of which was not covered. Cover any food product. Store eggs so that they do not contaminate any food product. Corrected during inspection. 177 Food storage Food stored in unprotected manner. Non-Critical Boxes stored on the floor in the walk-in freezer. Store food six inches above the floor. Corrected during inspection. 177 (a) 5 Uncovered foods (Critical) Foods are uncovered Non-Critical Foods stored uncovered in walk-in coolers such as pie, creme brulee, pasta salad, hot dogs, crepes, and lobster. All food should be stored covered or in packages. Corrected during inspection. 218 Equipment repair Equipment in need of repair. Non-Critical Sprayer nozzle in the 3 bay dish area does not work properly. When in use the nozzle sprays water from the sides as well as the bottom. Reapair or replace. 234 In use utensil storage In use utensil(s) stored improperly. Non-Critical Knife stored in the sanitizer bucket. Do not store utensils or any equipment in the sanitizer bucket. Corrected during inspection. 294 Chemical sanitizer concentration Chemical sanitizer not present, not at proper concentration, and/or temperature for in-place sanitizer, manual or machine warewashing. Critical Dish machine sanitizer is reading at 0ppm. Sous Chef states that a technician has been called and will arrive later today to fix the machine. The employees will sanitize dishes in the 3 bay sink. 295 (a) (b) Food contact surface(s) soiled Food contact surface(s) soiled. Critical Deli style slicer soiled. Clean and sanitize. Clean slicer after each use or after every 4 hours during constant use. 295 (c) Non food contact surface cleaning frequency Non-food contact surface(s) soiled. Non-Critical Reach in freezer on the cook line closest to the wait staff area is soiled. Clean and sanitize. 438 Toxic labeling Working container(s) of toxic materials not labeled with common name of contents. Critical

friday did /didn't:

made a comic.

plasma $100.

signed up for plasma reward app.

sent tommy $50.

paid phone bill $40.

got a job washing dishes at a country club. i go in tomorrow.

todo tonight:

x rough out 2021 taxes.

bmv memo

work on brief 20 minutes

x clean house 20 minutes.

set alarm?

income 2021

oil 3k, 3.5 k. 1200 st louis

5600 baltimore

1000 plasma

300 rent 2000 mom what else?

studies total 6800. total all sources 10,000.

2021 expenses miles 3000. = 1500. hotel 1300. tolls 50 days 40 days x 50 = 2000.

bar stuff 400 subtotal

4250.

6800 - 4250 = 2550.

fica on 2550 = 16% =

2550 x 0.16= $408. so tax due this year $408. ok.

scrap $100. + 16. = 424. so tax due this year $408 on gross earnings of $10,000.

I have $270 at paypal from bj, but get a check function wasn't working. try again in a few days?

call mark.

clean around stairs. wash potatoes.

laundry.

scrap yard.

install light bulb for car.

2/1/22 dumpster dive.