BioLife Plasma, L.L.C. 1200 Lakeside Drive Bannockburn, IL 60015, USA Biolife Plasma LLC in Bannockburn, IL - (224) 940-7611 Takeda 1-1, Nihonbashi-Honcho 2-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8668, Japan I have been trying for years to donate plasma at your greenfield indiana location. I have been given a lifetime ban because once, 4 or 5 years ago, I apparently took part in a clinical trial somewhere. I have no records or information about what this clinical trial was. They claim that your company has a policy such that I can never donate there without this information I don't have, in affect a lifetime ban, but they are unwilling to show me the policy in writing, so I am deeply skeptical that this exists. They also at one point claimed this is an FDA regulation, but again were unwilling to show me this in writing, and again I am deeply skeptical that the FDA has any such policy. If it does I will work with my senators to try to get this changed, so I need to know if this is real. I tried submitting this at the contact us page, but your captcha is not working and it would not submit.

draft: letter to daniel suhr re Smith v Helzer. Hi Daniel. With scotus considering Gaspee at friday's conference, I took a look at the docket and for the first time read your reply to the state's filing. Competent work as always. then ballotpedia pointed me to smith v helzer. I briefly considered moving to intervene. it's the sort of controversy that interests me. then when i noticed your name on the filing i figured it woul be simpler to just ask you if i could join as a plaintiff. it's a new enough filing that it can be amended without leave. alternatively i would be willing to be added as cocounsel, but i think plaintiff works better. If yes, then you would be my lawyer, and I always follow the wise counsel of my counsel, so feel free to ignore this next bit, but I have a few humble suggestions. Counts could be added under the alaska constitution. article I sections 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 16, 18,and 22. A damage claim could be added on both federal and state claims. The rights under McIntyre are sufficiently well established to arguably defeat QI. This presumes defendants have taken or will take some affirmative action to enforce the disclaimer rules; if they don't there is no liability. But it can reasonably be alleged. In Morse v Frederick Morse settled his state claims for $50,000 after losing at scotus. A damage claim defeats mootness if th legislature changes the rules during the litigation. Damages deter, provide leverage for settlement, enhance fees, and I could use the money. Up to you though. I am an Indiana resident; having an out of state plaintiff is useful to several lines of argument. I do not anticipate spending over $2000 on Alaska elections, but am happy to make some nominal donations for standing purposes. I am aware of Dick Randolph; I've been a fusion canidate myself. I'v been a supporter of Andre Marrou, a former Alaska legislator. I generally support, and advocate for, Alaska libertarian candidates. Meanwhile here in Indiana it looks like I will be bringing another disclaimer challeng sometime soon. Would be happy to have your organiation aboard as cocounsel. Happy to discuss any of this at your convenience. Sincerely, Robbin Stewart.

may 12 9 30 spaulding olive. thursday. olive, $11K. 1 month. Dates 1 in-house stay, lasting 25 days/24 nights and 1 Outpatient visits. Spaulding Clinical is currently looking for healthy male and female volunteers between the ages of 18 and 65, who have a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 35, to participate in a research study consisting of 1 in-house stay, lasting 25 days/24 nights with 1 outpatient visits in West Bend, Wisconsin. Those who qualify and complete the study may be eligible to receive payment of up to $11,430 for study-related time and travel.

tuesday did

called spaulding, booked screening.

2 loads luandry. cleaned car part way. $10.

next: gasbuddy. call from mark small,email fron brienne at elections department.

to do: look up andre dude OSNEL ANDRE SR Agent Address 4814 MAY RIDGE LN, Indianapolis, IN, 46254 Directors / Officers OSNEL ANDRE SR, agent, 28 Oct 2021- 5938 Lakeside Manor Ave; Indianapolis, IN 46254-5940 not sure which is which. (317) 457-7968

Andre currently resides at 6030 Northland Rd, Indianapolis, IN. Files show that one company is listed at this address: Indy Protective Services LLC. This address is also associated with the name of Lashonda K Jones, Michael R Jones Ii, and two other individuals. Andre owns the following phone numbers: (317) 985-6745 (Omnipoint Communications Midwest Operations, LLC), (317) 702-2602 Main Address 6030 Northland Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46228 Single Family, Attached Garage, 2 spaces, Haitian Family Auto, Osnel Andre Used Car Dealer |551103 - Automobile Dealers-Used Cars Be the first to review Haitian Family Auto Phone: 3176357073 1702 Lafayette Rd, Indianapolis, Indiana 46222-2809 to do: email collin re media credentials.

paid $127 at pnc. charged $50 at 5th 3rd for ballot acess news.

template for sign letter TO: Hendricks County Election Board. From: Robbin Stewart, esq. Re: Lack of disclaimer on Terry Judy for Sheriff campaign materials. cc: Indiana Election Division. July 30 th 2021 Recently at the Hendricks County Fair I met Terry Judy who is running for sheriff. I obtained two pieces of campaign materials, a postcard and a pen, which did not have the disclaimer which might be required under Indiana Code 3-9-3-2.5. The pen almost certainly falls under the exception for small items where a disclaimer would be impractical. As for the postcard, I did not find out for certain if there were more than 100, as required by the Indiana Supreme Court's decision in Majors v Abell, footnote 11.. I merely reasonably suspect so. His other materials had disclaimers. So on the one hand I am reporting a likely violation of the Indiana statute. Please keep me posted on how you choose to handle this case. On the other hand, it is my position that the statute conflicts with the state and federal constitution, and is void, as an interference with the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, right to petition, and right to privacy. See, for example, Robbin Stewart v Taylor (s d ind 1997), which found the previous Indiana disclaimer statute unconstitutional under McIntyre v Ohio Elections Commission (1995.) The leading state case is Price v Indiana (1993). McIntyre is still good law, as indicated in recent cases such as NIFLA v Becerra, Janus, and this month's AFP v Bonta. One way that you could handle this situation is to ask Indiana's Attorney General, Todd Rokita, for a formal opinion on whether 3-9-3-2.5 is constitutional. Or, I suppose, you could just do nothing. Or, under the statute, you could refer Mr. Judy for prosecution to the County prosecutor, which could send him to jail. His speech is core political speech, and it is his right as an American and Hoosier to distribute his postcards and campaign for office. I have no personal hostility towards Mr. Judy. My interest is in trying to get some resolution of this legal issue. Thank you for your attention to this matter. TO: Marion County Election Board. From: Robbin Stewart Re: Lack of disclaimer on Osnel Andre campaign materials. cc: Indiana Election Division. Mark Small April 18th 2022 Recently I noticed a campaign sign for Osnel Andre, which did not have the disclaimer which might be required under Indiana Code 3-9-3-2.5. The sign reads in full, VOTE MAY 2022 OSNEL ANDRE, SR. PIKE TOWNSHIP MARION COUNTY CONSTABLE DEMOCRAT. I did not find out for certain if there were more than 100, as required by the Indiana Supreme Court's decision in Majors v Abell, footnote 11.. I merely reasonably suspect so. So on the one hand I am reporting a likely violation of the Indiana statute. Please keep me posted on how you choose to handle this case. On the other hand, it is my position that the statute conflicts with the state and federal constitution, and is void, as an interference with the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, right to petition, and right to privacy. See, for example, Robbin Stewart v Taylor (s d ind 1997), which found the previous Indiana disclaimer statute unconstitutional under McIntyre v Ohio Elections Commission (1995.) The leading state case is Price v Indiana (1993). McIntyre is still good law, as indicated in recent cases such as NIFLA v Becerra, Janus, and AFP v Bonta. One way that you could handle this situation is to ask Indiana's Attorney General, Todd Rokita, for a formal opinion on whether 3-9-3-2.5 is constitutional. Or, I suppose, you could just do nothing. Or, under the statute, you could refer Mr. Andre for prosecution to the County prosecutor, which could send him to jail. His speech is core political speech, and it is his right as an American and Hoosier to distribute his signs and campaign for office. I have no personal hostility towards Mr. Andre. My interest is in trying to get some resolution of this legal issue. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

to do monday

laundry

on hold now with wisconsin

sweep stairs, bring in food, clean fridge

x email mark small. go thru emails.

email clerk's office. voter ID. x press creentials notice re sign. what else?

april 7.

trip report.

wisconsin and back april 6. 700 miles = $350. 1 day = 50. imputed expenses.

so so far this year st louis trip 600 miles 2 days $40 lodging. other st louis trip 600 miles 1 day. january.

cululative 1900 miles 4 days $40 lodging. $950 + 200 + 40. = $1190. in expenses.

possible income this trip $55. if i get into the study $3500.

actual expenses $80 gas $10 2 work shirts $3 piggly wiggly. i'm forgetting some expense. coffee $4. so $100.

received income from work $800 for two weeks. lower because cut down to 5 days.

to do list

1.

go do plasma saturn call first. do tomorrow before work. 2.

clean downstairs from racoon 3.

clean fridge with bleach 4.

get mark normand ticket. did list thursday

unloaded car.

cleaned up recycling area. bath. coffee.