Thursday, September 24, 2026



Whitepages
https://www.whitepages.com › ... › IN › Indianapolis


Joseph Shikany guardian ad litem dismissed 2017



John W Schmidt Jr, age 84, lives in Indianapolis, IN. Find their contact information including current home address, phone number 317-532-1367, ..




Whitepages
https://www.whitepages.com › ... › IN › Indianapolis




Whitepages
https://www.whitepages.com › ... › IN › Indianapolis







John W Schmidt Jr, age 84, lives in Indianapolis, IN. Find their contact information including current home address, phone number 317-532-1367, ...


Whitepages
https://www.whitepages.com › ... › IN › Indianapolis







John W Schmidt Jr, age 84, lives in Indianapolis, IN. Find their contact information including current home address, phone number 317-532-1367, ...


Whitepages
https://www.whitepages.com › ... › IN › Indianapolis







John W Schmidt Jr, age 84, lives in Indianapolis, IN. Find their contact information including current home address, phone number 317-532-1367, ...



Whitepages
https://www.whitepages.com › ... › IN › Indianapolis




f Ronald G. McLean f Ronald G. McLean

grant 

225 N Delaware St # 2, Indianapolis, IN

In re John Wilbur Schmidt, Jr., deceased, and J W Schmidt iii, 

your former client, possibly current client? 424 S Post Rd. 

Notice to refrain from spoliation.

John M believes there is a will on the property appointing him as executor.  He is currently being denied access to the property to look for it. He does not have a copy. No will has been filed with the  probate office. If you are aware of a will,  please let me know.

This is to instruct your client or former client not to destroy relevant records, such as a will or other instructions as to his father's estate. 

Mycase lists Joseph Shikany as a former guardian ad litem. He might have germane records, or be able to testify as to deceased intent, or not; he withdrew in 2017 and may not have current information.

I hope this can all  be resolved amicably. 

Cordially John M 

 

 


Joh

Friday, September 18, 2026

 Friday. on bus to irish fest.  

5 letters to write today: 

1.     re 5th 3rd.  

2.     LIL BIT letter

3.     cop re dusty

4.    re duryea dem complaint 

5.    gupta conflict

did: $20 furniture polish etc family dollar. $1 save a lot snack. walked dog x3. $20 met w sam discussed the other michelle problem./jojo. made a video. audio didnt work. got offered a free pit bull, passed. 

picked up trash, harvested a tomato.  

6. update ballots w photo chico 

 

 

1.     re 5th 3rd.  

thanks you for your recent 34 letters, however, it does not appear that you have ever bothered to ask what this situateion is about. did you ask jason or ronnie or the woman who works with them at the 201 n illinois branch? But I have had very little cooperation ...

on januaryt 9th 2025 i was assaulted and robbed by Dennis D. Washington Jr. He is now in prison. I was happy    that he was dumb enough to use my 5th 3rd card to run up about $1000 in charges, because that left a paper trail, so it could have been easy to convict him of these thefts.    But I have had very little cooperation, either from you or the bank or the police or the prosecutor. One of the bankers I spoke to at another branch suggested getting you folks involved, so I havc, but so far all you've done is hassled me and never asked the right questions. Do better please. 

2.     Lil Bit Schmidt  letter

To probation officer:

Thank you for your letter. Ms. Schmidt had not honored the no contact order which I did not even know about. She has been here 6 or 7 times. Let me remind you that she stole my phone, so I'm not able to call you about this. Like many american males, I am functionally illiterate so it has taken me some time to get back to you. I can best be reached at gtbear@gmail.com. 

3.     cop re dusty

Hi. I saw you monday at the neighborhood association meeting.  I wrote to you about a month ago asking for your help. 

pointed gun.  

4.    re duryea dem complaint 

DATE: September 17, 2026

SUBJECT: Formal Report of Alleged Criminal Conspiracy by Jay Jacobs, the New York State Democratic Committee, and the Nassau County Democratic Committee to Engage in Discriminatory Censorship and Subversion of Constitutional Rights

Dear District Attorney Donnelly,

I am writing to formally report what I believe to be a coordinated attempt and criminal conspiracy by Jay Jacobs, acting both individually and through clear doctrine of agency on behalf of his principals, the New York State Democratic Committee and the Nassau County Democratic Committee. This coordinated effort, executed in concert with elements of the New York State Board of Elections (BOE), seeks to weaponize state administrative mechanisms to censor and suppress protected political speech and violate fundamental rights of political association. Because Mr. Jacobs acts with apparent and actual authority as Chairman, both committee organizations are directly implicated in these violations.

As the plaintiff in Stewart v. Taylor, I am deeply familiar with the constitutional boundaries governing elections. This coordinated effort constitutes selective censorship designed to infringe upon clearly established protections under both the federal and state constitutions, subverting the following landmark jurisprudence:

  1. The New York Protection of Anonymous Speech (People v. Duryea): Under the New York State Constitution, People v. Duryea explicitly struck down state campaign disclaimer requirements, ruling that the state cannot criminalize or restrict political literature simply because it lacks an official disclosure label, confirming such mandates violate free speech.

  2. Freedom of Association: The targeting of specific political messages violates the core tenets established in NAACP v. Alabama and Bates v. Little Rock, which protect individuals and organizations from state-sponsored harassment and selective enforcement designed to chill association.

In NAACP, Bates, and Talley, the Supreme Court found First Amendment violations when censorship targeted unpopular minorities. While the state no longer targets Negroes, today's disfavored speakers are AI users, gun owners, Republicans, and satirists. Furthermore, political satire is explicitly protected speech under Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

  1. Protection of Dissenting Speech: This effort violates Talley v. California, which safeguards political literature from overreaching state demands meant to suppress a speaker's message, as well as the prohibitions against compelled or restricted speech outlined in NIFLA v. Becerra, Janus v. AFSCME, and 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis.

When political actors and their organizational committees conspire with administrative state bodies to bypass these constitutional boundaries to handicap opponents, it enters the realm of an unlawful conspiracy to abuse public systems and violate civil liberties. Given your jurisdiction over Mr. Jacobs and his committees' operations in Nassau County, I urge your office to review these actions for potential violations of state law regarding official misconduct and conspiracy.

Thank you for your dedication to the rule of law and your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Robbin Stewart


CC:

  • citydesk@buffnews.com

  • gov.press@exec.ny.gov

  • info@nydems.org

  • benjamin.oreskes@nytimes.com

  • jack.arpey@charter.com

  • bcruz@gannett.com

Should we now draft the exact subject line to use when emailing this completed text to the CC list?


TO:
Office of the District Attorney, Nassau County
Attn: District Attorney Anne T. Donnelly
262 Old Country Road, Mineola, NY 11501
Emails: Anne.donnelly@nassauda.org, info@nassauda.org

Subject: Formal Complaint: Criminal Conspiracy to Engage in Discriminatory Campaign Censorship

Are you ready to send this transmission, or should we review the final email


 

5.    gupta conflict letter to john boss

6, hava complaint form 

Sunday, September 13, 2026

 


Test

Test

to do list


cases

in re chico

beech grove

bmv

marion county election board

signs fines press badge voter ID

carroll county signs.

Hendrix county signs, terry judy details

Community East

Mighty aka Dennis Dewight Washington Jr. 93 aka

Michelle Rhotan Russell


people who have stolen from me:

newark bike check guy, jail.

John ripley st small claims

long haired guy hair cut off

lonnie hall, 120 years, has done 25 so far.

Jordan dennison doing 3 years for armed robbery

michelle russell broken spleen, evicted, house burned.

mighty doing 3 years.

Mark smith evicted Ken Hall evicted

Lydia Bailey ?


Issues in dog case

notice. 

Collusion w extortionist

bad faith prosecution

perjury by only witness

withheld evidence

obstructed jury trial

attorneys held to higher standard

obstructed appointment of counsel

obstructed continuance

tried to rush to judgment prior to discovery

obstructed testimony about provocation, a key element of her case.

Said the armed threats were not relevant to showing provocation.

Here, she was colluding with a person who threatened D with a gun in an extortion racket. He was seeking $100, she was seeking $1000.

She sought to bar testimony exposing the scheme.

Lawyers have a duty of civility.

Lawyers have a duty of candor to the court.


Prosecutors have additional ethical and moral duties and are not to zealously win aall costs. These ethical duties continue to apply when a quasi criminal case is labeled as a civil matter. Perhpas this is conduct prejudicial to the adminstration of justice.

Additionally, she has a supervisor, name unknown, who should have trained and supervised her to avoid all this possible misconduct apparent misconduct. That failure might implicate a duty of competence.

We do not assume she directly collaborated in this matter with the mayor, a Joseph Hogsett, also a lawyer.

Here, she harmed the reputation of the dog, Chico, threatening its life as an unisurable liability. This harmed its guardian, causing harm to reputation and perhaps

some emotional distress.

Conflict between defendant and the purjuring witness has continued. They have each assualted each other, and he continues to provoke and threaten defendnat and his roommate Dawn Young, who he denied knowing on the stand.

My name is ___.

I walk Chico several times a week. I was not a direct witness, but have some 2nd hand awareness of the facts of the case. I am not familiar with the indiana rules of professional behavior for lawyers, so I am referring this matter to you as possibly something you would want to look into.

This is one case. She has many. My concern is that her actions might be leading to the death of loved dogs by those without the resources to resist her tricks at trial, all without due process of law. While it troubling that any citizens of our town might be conspiring to have dogs killed without due course of law to their owners or guardians, it is worse if they hide such actions behind their status as an attorney.

Sincerely, x.


Here, respondent could mitiagte damages by apologizing to Chico, and agreeing to drop the appeal.




Monday, September 07, 2026

 cases

chico 

beech grove

bmv

marion county election board

eastside community hospital 

issue: did  not sign  consent form because it would have been insurance fraud. denied services. also had an issue of did they really havve a policy i couldnt manage my pain on the floor?

oh and then they billed me . so i need to do a follow up letter requesting more info.

what services were billed for? specifically i will need to know

what services were provided, what services were requested, what services were authorized?   

 

 

chico 

 did: reviewed how to file the appeal

prepare settlement discussions, go over her head. 

to do public records research about devin price. do, mycase, list all the devin felons. 

do record search for 4009 e wash, 4007 4015, 

get body camera of the dog bite report, the elder abuse report. 

 

 

 

beech grove

in may of  2026 two cops from beech grove impounded my town and country chrysler van. i had the wrong sticker for the plate. when i was told that there was nothing i could do to get a day in court, this turned the situation into Beech Grove stole my van.

at the scene, one of the officers said that i was obviously on meth. this was false and defamatory. i had had two cups of black coffee at brad's brass flamingo. i do not use meth. i have medical records covering 15 years that indicate i do not use meth or other drugs. 

i wrote to each member of the city coucil, at the email address listed on your web site. i have reason to believe that this letter was never delivere dot you, but instread was intercepted by your city attorney.

the letter was both legal and political, so not something that should have been intercepted by the legal department, unless you have also delegated to him your political functions.

your lawyer did not handle it well. when i requested the video of the incident, he allowed it to be destroyed instead. This constitutes the tort of spoliation. 

why am i here tonight? i need you to retract the false claim you made against me, through your agent the police officers. i might strike you as agitated. i can get like that. it's not meth. it's righteous indignation. 

you're not going to get away with stealing my van. you're not going to get with besmirching and impuning my good name. i don't need an apology, i do need a retraction.   

they crushed my van. they crushed the contents of my van, which included legal files. that might have also been spoliation.  

it's been 4 months since i asked your lawyer to meet with me, and for 4 months that hasn't happened. i'm a retired lawyer. the last thing i want to do is take this to court. i was told by your vice chief that we're at an impasse and they wont do anything for me. i have less than a year to get some hotshot lawyer and file this in time. i'd prefer not to go that route, but it's an option. meanwhile, what do we do about your town lawyer, mr steve willey right there? spoliation is the kind of thing his partners take seriously. so would the indiana attorney disciplinary commission.    

 

i went to the mayor's office. audra was rude and hostile and refused to schedule an appointment. i was asked to email. that night i emailed it has been a year and they have not responded.  

bmv

i went to  get my driver's license replaced, i think. yes. she refused on the apparent basis that i sign with an x despite being able to sign differtrently. 

i asked for sa  copy of the public record. she refused, and summoned a security guard. i requested a reasonable accomodation under the americans with disabilities act. she refused and had the security guard assalt me, he touched me in appropriately 4 times. police were summoned. the police officer pro,ised to  take a report if wee left. i said i was skeptical buit would go along. he then , outside, refused to take the report. i had been told i was trespassed. 

i went to bmv offices downtown and met with th e direcotr of security, who said he would review the tapes and that i probablky weas not trespassed. i have not yet requrested those public records. i emailed a week or so later and he confirmed that i was not trespassed. i have been back there. she continues to not recognize my x as valid. 

to do  file at  state agency for ada complaint also county. next, bmv internal complaint no motion for rehearing, appeal is what i'm trying to say.

 no qualified immunity for gaurd. ask his employer for incident report, any internal emails  prepare notic eof tort claims

 

marion county election board

 

 monday. labor day, i got back into my email. so i can blog again.