303 llc notes

It seeks to use its law to compel an individual to create speech she does not believe. The question we face is whether that course violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.

The framers designed the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to protect the “freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think.”

An end because the freedom to think and speak is among our inalienable human rights. See, e.g., 4 Annals of Cong. 934 (1794) (Rep. Madison). A means because the freedom of thought and speech is “indispensable to the discovery and spread of political truth.”

In seeking to compel students to salute the flag and recite a pledge, the Court held, state authorities had “transcend[ed] constitutional limitations on their powers.” 319 U. S., at 642. Their dictates “invade[d] the sphere of intellect and spirit which it is the purpose of the First Amendment . . . to reserve from all official control.”

 to do sample letters

to 

senator young

blake johnson

senator whats her name andrea hunley

dear senator young / banks

i am writing to express my concerns about the expenditure of 17 million in a federal grant to the city of beech grove for reconstruction of emerson avenue, at a time when the government faces calls for shutdown due to an ongoing failure to balance the budget. 

we cain't afford it. emerson can wait. personally if the funds existed, which they dont, i would rather see such funds alloicated to civilian relief in uktaine.

in 1974 i wrote to senator joe biden about federal funding of a transportation grant in northern delaware. I expressed concerns that his proposed 80-20 federal local split could encourage unwise spending; that a 50 50 split of federal and local funding would be more sensible.  The next year I met Mr. Biden in person. 

My mother had known him since 1968 because after she retired from the State Department, she attended the local planning meetings and knew the local budgets inside and out. I lack her full skill set, but a bit of that rubbed off on me, and I've been to law school twice.

So it's not like my concern is a new one merely because beech grove stole my van and falsely accused me of being on drugs. Maybe I'm being petty, but I will try to make sure my $1500 van they stole costs them some of their 17 million.

I estimate at  10% chance of success if I send at least 100 letters.  this is 1 of 100. 

to governor braun,

i am writing to express my concern about a proposed $17 million dollar grant to the city of beech grove

for reconstruction of emerson ave. 

please provide me with a copy of the plans or proposals or whatever. 

please help president trump get the federal budget under control. the debt is too high. 

i have only met you in person one time, when president trump introduced you and endorsed you for the senate.  

we are trying to drain the swamp.

what i am seeking is that the federal government provide no more than 50% of the funding, until such time as the federal budget is balanced and has a surplus of the 17 million. 

from;

so do a form letter that would fit on a postcard

1 to mayor joe

2 city councilperson jesse ferguson 

3 congressman carson

4 mayor of beech grove

5 governor braun

6 optional lt governor

7 state senator hunley 

8 state reps 

9 district 100 

10 senator young

11 senator banks 

cc city council

bcc city lawyer

the idea is to get them all on an endless email chain. 

1 to mayor joe

2 city councilperson jesse ferguson 

3 congressman carson

4 mayor of beech grove

5 governor braun

6 optional lt governor

7 state senator andrea hunley 

8 state reps 

9 district 100 blake johnson 

10 senator young

11 senator banks 

cc city council

bcc city lawyer

the idea is to get them all on an endless email chain. 

Hiya. As your constituent, I am asking for a little help getting information about grant # 

I am inclined to be against the proposal but I want to study it closely first.  

me

gtbear

alicia 

sam 

• te for complete cancellation—it's tied to proven crash data (33 serious/fatal incidents 2018–2022), and Beech Grove was the only IN municipality to win implementation funding this round (others got planning grants).
• Higher for modifications (e.g., fewer roundabouts, different designs, or added features).
• Once design advances and contracts are signed (likely 2027–2028), it's much harder to unwind.

Bottom line: The clock is ticking, but you've got years before shovels hit dirt. If you're serious about pushing back, start with city council/public meetings and gathering lo

Federal grants like this aren't instant checks—they involve:

• Obligation deadlines — The city must obligate (commit) funds by signing agreements and starting key steps within a set time (often 1–2 years from award). If they drag or fail to meet requirements, USDOT can deobligate/redirect funds.
• Environmental/permitting hurdles — NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) review could take 6–18 months. Public comment periods are required during this (and possibly during design phases).
• Local approvals — Beech Grove City Council must approve budgets, contracts, designs, any rezoning/eminent domain for right-of-way, etc. Council meetings are public (next one Feb 2, 2026, per their site).
• Potential for changes — Scope can be scaled back, roundabouts redesigned/removed, or alternatives proposed if there's strong pushback.

Realistic Ways to Try to Influence or Stop It

If your goal is to halt the roundabouts (or the whole thing), focus on these pressure points soon—before momentum builds:

1. Attend/speak at City Council meetings — Public comment periods are your best shot. Monitor beechgrove.com for agendas/minutes (they post them). Raise concerns like traffic flow impacts (roundabouts can frustrate drivers on arterials), costs/delays, or alternatives (e.g., better signals instead).
2. Organize or join public comments during NEPA/environmental review — This is federally required and mandatory for public input. Watch for announcements from the city or INDOT (since it's a state road corridor).
3. Contact key people:
   • Mayor James Coffman (he's quoted positively but might respond to constituents).
   • City Council members.
   • Beech Grove Public Works/Engineering department.
   • Your state reps/senators (since it's federal money, though SS4A is competitive and already awarded).
4. Build opposition — Rally neighbors/businesses along the corridor (e.g., via Nextdoor, local Facebook groups, or petitions). Common roundabout concerns: emergency response delays, confusion for older drivers, business access issues during construction.
5. Legal/advocacy routes — If environmental justice, historic impacts, or procedural issues arise, groups like Indiana Sierra Club or local traffic safety advocates might get involved (though unlikely to kill it outright).

Odds of Fully Stopping It

• Low to moderate for complete cancellation—it's tied to proven crash data (33 serious/fatal incidents 2018–2022), and Beech Grove was the only IN municipality to win implementation funding this round (others got planning grants).
• Higher for modifications (e.g., fewer roundabouts, different designs, or added features).
• Once design advances and contracts are signed (likely 2027–2028), it's much harder to unwind.

Bottom line: The clock is ticking, but you've got years before shovels hit dirt. If you're serious about pushing back, start with city council/public meetings and gathering local support now—that's when influence is cheapest. If you want help drafting talking points, finding meeting dates, or checking for any new developments, just say the word! 🚧

 Haha, alright—message received loud and clear. 😈

Public record still shows zero organized opposition as of right now (mid-January 2026). No petitions, no "Stop the Emerson Roundabouts" Facebook groups, no Nextdoor rants gaining traction, no Reddit threads, no letters to the editor calling it a boondoggle. The news posts (WISH-TV, FOX59, WRTV, city announcements) have light comment sections—mostly questions like "Which intersections exactly?", "How bad will construction suck?", "Why roundabouts instead of better signals?", or skeptical one-liners like "Nobody walks there anyway" or "Traffic's already a nightmare, imagine during build." Positive vibes dominate, with people glad about the crash

test where are you?

This exact phrasing (or very close) appeared in your prior litigation history, like in Stewart v. Taylor (related to a 1996 Center Township Advisory Board run, where a sign at IPS 101 read similarly and lacked identification of who paid for it).

You ran again for Center Township Board District 5 as a Republican in the 2024 general election (against Karen A. Mitchell, per Ballotpedia and Marion County filings).

Assuming this sign is homemade (e.g., hand-made, personal printer, no professional payment or committee funds), it fits the "personal/homemade" category we've discussed—low-cost, grassroots, independent expression.

Why Facial Challenge Fits This Hook

Yes, facial challenge to IC 3-9-3-2.5 makes sense as the broader play here, especially if you're aiming to revisit the statute's sweep after the Majors loss. The hook—"Robbin Stewart for Township Board Vote Tuesday"—is a classic express advocacy yard sign: it clearly identifies you (a candidate) and urges a vote on a specific election day (Tuesday, implying an imminent or past election). No party, no disclaimer, no payer info—just the message.

 

Primary Menu

• News
• Weather
• Watch Live
• Morning News
• Sports
• Indy Now
• Marketplace
• More

Search

News

City of Beech Grove receives $17 million federal grant to make Emerson Avenue safer

by: Austin Hanson

Posted: Jan 11, 2026 / 08:28 PM EST

Updated: Jan 11, 2026 / 08:28 PM EST

SHARE

BEECH GROVE, Ind. — The City of Beech Grove has received a $17 million grant to make parts of Emerson Avenue safer.

According to a press release, the City received the grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation. The grant is part the USDOT’s Safe Street and Roads for All (SS4A) program and is worth $17,082,400 in total.

The funding will pay for the majority of the City of Beech Grove’s Emerson Avenue High Injury Network Safety Improvement initiative. The project’s total price tag is $21.35 million.

The City has indicated that its initiative “will boost safety for drivers, pedestrians, cyclists and transit users along Emerson Avenue between Victory Drive and Main Street.”

Crews will do the following along Emerson Avenue during the project:

• Replace four signalized intersections with modern roundabouts
• Close three median cuts
• Add raised medians along the roadway
• Add pedestrian refuge islands at 17 crossings to solve right-angle conflicts
• Install pedestrian-activated, rectangular, rapid-flashing beacons at 20 crossings
• Fill sidewalk gaps
• Widen sidewalks to meet ADA standards
• Connect the existing Hornet Greenway and Franciscan Trail to downtown Main Street
• Upgrade IndyGo bus stops for ADA compliance

“This federal grant allows us to make meaningful, long-term safety improvements that our residents have been asking for,” Beech Grove Mayor James Coffman said via release. “By redesigning Emerson Avenue, we are creating safer crossings, calmer traffic, and better access for people of all ages and abilities.”

Per the City, between 2018 and 2022, one fatal crash and 32 serious injury crashes happened along the stretch of Emerson Avenue crews will improve with funding provided by the USDOT. Officials in Beech Grove have also indicated that their city is the only one in Indiana to receive grant money from the USDOT’s SS4A program.

“In addition to safety and greater connectivity, this grant award will change the gateway to our city for the better,” Coffman said. “This is a highly visible corridor that stretches for nearly two miles, with several parcels that are ripe for redevelopment. At its completion, it will result in a transformation that truly occurs only once in a generation.” 

The City of Beech Grove’s grant application was spearheaded by Andrew Wolf with CrossRoad Engineers. The application was backed by the likes of U.S. Representative Jefferson Shreve, U.S. Senators Todd Young and Jim Banks and Indiana State Representative Julie McGuire and Mitch Gore.