Did:
Joell:
wrote outline of complaint.
made notes for injunction.
made notes for complaint

did laundry and dishes.
called and faxed re credit card bill: i won a round!
but i need to resend the fax.

confirmed ctb.
left stupid message for bowen firm.

didn't fix tire.
to do: inflate donut spare.
send fax.

To do:

IRS
CCA
Joell - draft complaint
Dept of Revenue - privacy act
Lt Governor - request for appointment
Battery issue
Postmaster issue re 227
call police re junior and heather
contact east district

20 other things...


To do:

IRS - mail 1099's. write cover letter.
http://www.irs.gov/advocate/ - printed out form

Indianapolis

575 N. Pennsylvania St., Room 581, Stop TA770, Indianapolis, IN 46204


317-685-7840
317-685-7790
CCA
Joell - draft complaint
Dept of Revenue - privacy act

Alex D. Huskey, Superintendent
Indiana State Excise Police

Alcohol Laws
The Excise Police would like you to know...

1. Persons thought to be less than 26 years of age should be asked to produce reliable proof of age. Suggested items of identification are picture ID's, including but not limited to, a driver's license, state-issued ID card, US Government identification. REMEMBER: If you still question the age of the person you should refuse to serve them.

Indiana Alcohol & Tobacco Commission
Indiana Government Center South, Room E-114
302 W. Washington Street
Indianapolis, IN 4620
(317) 232-2430 (voice)
(317) 234-1520 (fax)


NAME DEPARTMENT / DUTIES PHONE
Amador, Sherri Processor (317) 232-2460
Barnett, Aloris Accounting Clerk (317) 232-2431
Beck, Susan Employee Permits (317) 232-2455
Bhatt, Shachi File Clerk (317) 232-2434
Burton, Julie Commission Secretary (317) 232-2433
Callahan, Cheri Employee Permits (317) 232-2455
Chew, Kim Paralegal (317) 233-3940
Choe, U-Jung Hearing Judge (317) 232-2472
Coxey, Melissa Staff Attorney (317) 234-4737
Drewry, Jenny Prosecutor (317) 232-2474
Fawl, Margaret Processor (317) 232-2442
Feeney, Nora Processor (317) 232-2449
Fulford, Patrick Master Officer, Office of Professional Standards (317) 232-4826
Glass, Brenda Processor (317) 232-2432
Guthrie, Frank Commissioner (317) 232-2439
Hartwell, Nancy Accounting / Cashier (317) 232-2441
Heath, Dave Indiana ATC Chairman (317) 232-2430
Huskey, Alex Superintendent, Excise Police (317) 232-2452
Johnson, David Vice Chair (317) 232-2439
Kirby, Shirley Office Manager (317) 232-2468
Poindexter, Robin Major, Excise Police (317) 232-2452
Robbins, Jackie Master Officer, Public Relations Officer (317) 232-2469
Rose, Dan Lieutenant, Special Operations (317) 232-2456
Rosemeyer, Mike Trade and Industry Relations (317) 293-9250
Stephens, Vicki Controller (317) 232-2436
Sturtz, Dale Commissioner (317) 232-2430
Washington, Michelle Secretary, Excise Police (317) 232-2452
Barbara Piper Receptionist (317) 232-2430
Wheat, Roxie Employee Permits (317) 233-3941

To: Dave Heath, Chairman, Alcohol and Tobacco Commission.

Dear Mr. Heath,

This spring my server's permit was stolen, so I went to the ATC office to get a new one. The form required a social security number. I pointed out that this violates the privacy Act of 1974, as amended. The staff told me to wait while she got a higher up staff person, who then said she had no idea what I was talking about.
I followed up by emailing your staff attorney, who wrote back that the privacy act is inapplicable to states. Since that is false, and the privacy act does apply to states, I wrote her back with proof she was wrong.
I have never heard back from her.

When any federal or state agency (certain exeptions not applicable here) demands a social security number, the privacy act requires, when requested, that an applicant be given a written statement of how the number will be used by the agency. These are generally referred to as "Privacy Act statements".

I remain unconvinced that your agency is in compliance with federal law.
Meanwhile, I don't have my permit.
Please advise.
Cordially,
Robbin Stewart esq.






Lt Governor - request for appointment
By Phone: 317-232-4545

By Mail:
Office of the Lieutenant Governor
Statehouse
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2797


Battery issue - request for repeal X
Postmaster general issue re 227 X
John E. Potter June 1, 2001
If you suspect any of these activities call 1-888-877-7644
http://www.uspsoig.gov/whodoestwhat.htm
United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General
1735 N. Lynn St
10th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-2020

To: Office of Inspector General, USPS

Dear Sir,

The post office refuses to deliver mail to my home at 227 N temple Street in Indianapolis IN. I have owned the house for ten years. During that time, my mail service has been turned off 5 or 6 times. each time, it was without proper notice to me.
I have written letters. I have gone in person and explained the problem to my local postmistress. I have begged and pleaded. Nothing works.

I am aware that my house is a shack and it may be hard for them to undestand that someone would live there. I'm poor. Deal with it.
I am aware that, as a shut in with medical problems, I haven't always picked the mail up every day. There have been times when I've found it hard to get out of bed for a week or two. This is a not a legitimate reason to fail to inform me if they decide to again turn off my mail.
I recieved today, in person, a notice from the Indiana Supreme Court, that had been returned to sender as undeliverable.
I cashed, yesterday, a check for three years worth of payments from a retirement fund that handn't been able to send me mail at my home. I really needed the money three years ago whne they first tried to send it.
I have been renting a room to a guy. His excuse last month why he didn't have his rent on time was that his social security check had been returned as undeliverable.
Mos tof the mail gets through just fine most of the time. Sometimes we some of it. Sometimes we get none of it.
This has been disasterous for me, and has contributed to the failure of my business.

I am writing, not just about my own situation, but that of the many other Americans who must be going through the same problem.
What I am asking the postal service to do is to change its procedures, so that when you decide you don't feel like delivering somebody's mail anymore, that you give them written notice that you doing so.
There are times when people move and leave no address, and the postal service starts sending their mail back to sender. Fine. But wouldn't it be fairer to TELL somebody before you stop their mail?
Please let me know what I need to do to formally submit this proposal for consideration.

Cordially,
Robbin Stewart
227 N Temple 46201.





Executive Committee
John E. Potter, Postmaster General and Chief Executive Officer
Patrick R. Donahoe, Deputy Postmaster General and COO
Harold Glen Walker, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
Anita J. Bizzotto, Chief Marketing Officer, Executive Vice President
Anthony Vegliante, Chief HR Officer, Executive Vice President
Thomas G. Day, Senior Vice President, Government Relations
Mary Anne Gibbons, Senior Vice President, General Counsel
Linda Kingsley, Vice President, Strategic Planning

http://www.treas.gov/auctions/


call police re junior and heather
contact east district

20 other things...

Next day: major writer's block. can't seem to get started.
lawsuits:
cca
joell
samoa

lawsuits:
cca .. prepare response to recent findings by judge.

joell ... add seizure claim, work on damages
samoa ........ respond to filing.
hey judge - this deed should not issue.


Yesterday I received the first actual notive of this lawsuit.
I conceed that notice had been sent earlier, but did not come to my attention until yesterday.
I suspect that there are other [defendants/respondents] who have not had actual notice, or who are indigent and unable to respond, but have not been informed of their statutory right to indigent counsel.





It is an attempted taking with due compenation, prohibited by the Indiana constitution.
It is a violation of procedural and substantive due process.
It is theft and extortion.
It is an injustice and unethical.

Confiscation by government of privately held land is a major purpose of communism.
Our market economy, on the other hand, requires protection of the institution of private property.

The suit is a not uncommon attack by a Republican Party offical on the system of private property and market economies.

I am not objecting to property taxation in general.
The some 400 properties listed here are being confiscated by government, as part of a long process of denying the property owners their rights, while imposing undue burdens which make the properties unmarketable, valueless and worthless.
My property on Samoa is a case in point.

There are two main problems with the ways these properties have been treated.

One problem is that they have been assessed at far far more than their market value,
violating the Indiana Constitution as understood by Boehm v Town of St John.
My lot on Samoa was purchased from the county for about $250 in about 2001.
Promptly my use rights were challenged by Tom Whathisname, who
first imposed an annual regulatory burden in excess of the fair market value of the property (see generally, Nolan, Dolan, Epstein's Takings.)

He then imposed liens in excess of the market value.
Meanwhile, the lot was reassessed at more than ten times its actual worth, so that the taxes were also ten times as high as they should have been, resulting in confiscation.
I was denied the right to appeal the misassessment - instead, the assessor had me ejected from his office by men with guns.

We know objectively that the liens and taxes added up to more than the FMV of the property. We know this because when the property was offered for sale, repeatedly, for the amount of the back taxes, there were no buyers. No one in their right mind would by the property at such an overinflated value.
I was not in my right mind when I attempted to buy the property - the $250 I paid represents a maximum, but not a minimum. Usually a sale price is the best indicator of value, but not where, as here, one party is non compos mentos and no meeting of the minds occured.
Rescission is an appropriate equitable remedy under the circumstances.

I urge the court to deny movants's petition for the issuance of deeds at thi stime.
I encourage tghe court to appoint a special master to review the records, to determine whethere there has been actual notice and an opportunity to respond, including appointment of counsel for the indigent.
The court should use exacting scrutiny in evaluating movant's attempt to steal this land, and should order due compenation be paid.

Thos eare some first thoguths. I'm not being very coherent yet. Just needed to write up soemthing.



















bills:
rent
credit card
east district
2/8/06 burglary - find suspect
lonnie problem
cash the big check
irs
cle

habitat
mow lawn
monte mcquiston