Monday, March 30, 2015

saturday:

12 serve
1 oclock rally/protest
2 oclock meet re renting house.

electric bill at check cashing place $258.
collect rent nemo or send him to talbott.
email tad about talbott.
record something re temple
email joe re paperwork/expenses.

mail taxes
mail indiana unclaimed

Saturday, March 28, 2015

saturday:

12 serve
1 oclock rally/protest
2 oclock meet re renting house.

electric bill at check cashing place $258.
collect rent nemo or send him to talbott.
email tad about talbott.
record something re temple
email joe re paperwork/expenses.

mail taxes
mail indiana unclaimed

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

tuesday
got into both studies.
called nebraska back and cancelled.
took out trash.
am making house dinner.
need to bring lothes out of rain next and keep cooking.
get beets from car.
paid reit ar at bank. balane around $120
did not find keys yet
club tonight.

-if- i get in the study that is i dose, 5800+ 6900 = 12700.by may.
when do we get out? when is the burn in missouri?

what should i make for the house dinner tonight?

rice
garlic bread
salad w some killer dressing.
tahini/lime?

cabbage/potato colcannon.
apple/onion.
beets from car.
earl grey.
fruit cheese plate.

Saturday, March 14, 2015

drove to waukegan and back. 6 boxes groceries. $10 clubs in kokomo, 50 key club 6 months membership., screened for 5800 study, not the one i went there for.

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

mark smith paid $400 rent

nemo paid $40, owes at least $360.

paid $250 electic bill
$150 water bill.

took out trash.
folded clean towels.

swept kitchen floor
obtained pizza.
x to do: take boxes.
x take glass bottles to marsh.
x check email find phone. charge phone. call abbvie.
make better list.
re water hammer. kevin.
clean car.
wash dishes?
pick up laundry.
x obtained 100 pounds canned goods.

thursday did: went and looked at a $150,000 9 br 6 ba mansion.
not much else done yet.
booked abbvie screening for tomorrow.

to do move clothes to basement
pick up laundry at 4015.
email tad re 1244, 4015.
read letters from court.






weds
meeting
laundry
utilities
read mail
drop off food.
recycle boxes

thurs
realtor re illiois
go by 124 talbot
collect ren

Monday, March 09, 2015

tuesday:

bank
po box
rent
bills
Debts, for tickets, fines and other obligations that a consumer did not enter an agreement to pay, can no longer be reported. And under the new plan, consumers whose disputes are not resolved to their satisfaction will get information on what they can do to follow up.
monday drove home

done: dishes

to do
Xtrash
X compost
put away dove food
X vacuum
X swept stairs

tidy my room
trash outside
laundry at 4015. dishrags towels
collect rent 4015.

water plants
throw away murdered plants

plant garden stuff indoors
1/2 unpack car
sort new clothes.
wash car
send i2i email.
hug xander.
check all fridges
make plans for car repairs.

strip club



Friday, March 06, 2015

saturday: finish study
breakfast
meet helen
get tire.
gas up, repack car.
foodnotbombs.
go.

I like concertos for basoon.
I'm sick of "dark side of the moon"
I like the clash, my jams, xy-deco,
I like elvis "in the ghetto".
I admit to a connection
with gaga and one direction
I like hydrox and nabisco
but i panic! at the disco
I like bands you've never heard of
and when Bowie takes his shirt off.
I think Phillip Glass is on it.
Let with answer with a sonnet.

Pre-St Paddy's day party. March 14th

[–]BleezyEnternational   
I enjoy fishing in that pond on new Haven. We even slipped our little Jon boat in.
96th and allisonville fishing?
http://www.eventbrite.com/e/adoption-law-cle-how-to-represent-families-in-an-adoption-tickets-15100010538?aff=ebapi

Wednesday, March 04, 2015

Look, I can understand why someone would believe that disclaimer requirements violate the 1A. (I honestly don't see the relevance of the 14th here, though.) However, that doesn't mean that the requirements actually ARE unconstitutional. It just means that there's a theory about why they SHOULD BE deemed unconstitutional.
Certainly, I'd say that it's totally plausible that different rules could apply to private individuals, to advocacy groups, to political parties, and to the campaigns of actual candidates. It's also plausible that requirements could apply only to instances of expression which cross some threshold based upon cost and/or the number of individuals who would see/hear a message.
It looks to me as if Talley only makes clear that the California law was overbroad, and that total bans on anonymous political speech actually are unconstitutional. The court found in McIntyre's case that she wasn't required to include a disclaimer, but she was a private individual. Stewart seems to be about a single yard sign. None of these cases establishes that disclaimer requirements are always unconstitutional, which is the claim you seem to be making.


gt bear

gt bear a few seconds ago

oh this is interesting, didnt see it at the time. feel free to drop me a line at gtbear at gmail. you position sounds to me like saying there's just a theory that slavery is unconstitutional. mcintyre held that there is no elections exception to the rule in talley. they didnt create some new exception for little old ladies. there is a conflict between what the court has ruled and what the executive and legislative branches want, but marbury v madison mostly settled that one.