Friday, October 19, 2018

pnc 218292004179
jennifer *lnu  614 856 2435
unwiling to send letter confirming our conversation.
https://www.extramilefdn.org/board_staff.php

In 2009, BlackRock first became the No. 1 asset manager worldwide.[11] 

In 2014, The Economist said that BlackRock's $4 trillion under management made it the "world's biggest asset manager," and it was larger than the world's largest bank, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China with $3 trillion.[5] In May of the same year, BlackRock invested in Snapdeal.[19]
BlackRock spokesman Farrell Denby

Logo of iShares ("iShares by BlackRock")
iShares is a family of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) managed by BlackRock. The first iShares ETFs were known as World Equity Benchmark Shares (WEBS) but have since been rebranded.[1]
Each iShares fund tracks a bond or stock market index. Stock exchanges listing iShares funds include the London Stock ExchangeAmerican Stock ExchangeNew York Stock ExchangeBATS ExchangeHong Kong Stock ExchangeToronto Stock ExchangeAustralian Securities Exchange, and a number of European and Asian stock exchanges. iShares is the largest issuer of ETFs in the US and globally.[2][3]
clause, a later bid by BlackRock was announced on 11 June 2009 for the whole of the parent division Barclays Global Investors including iShares, 

Top 10 Owners of BlackRock Inc


StockholderStakeShares
owned
Total value ($)Shares
bought / sold
Total
change
PNC Bank, NA (Investment Manageme...21.45%34,223,29416,130,465,161+3,240+0.01%
The Vanguard Group, Inc.5.46%8,719,1714,109,606,867-5,859-0.07%
Capital Research & Management Co....5.14%8,204,8653,867,199,020+407,082+5.22%
Norges Bank Investment Management5.06%8,078,9623,807,857,159-31,510-0.39%
BlackRock Fund Advisors3.44%5,482,4862,584,060,126-276,509-4.80%
SSgA Funds Management, Inc.3.24%5,166,8372,435,285,283-97,815-1.86%
Wellington Management Co. LLP2.81%4,487,9432,115,302,174-709,028-13.64%
Fidelity Management & Research Co...2.27%3,615,8941,704,279,319-267,777-6.89%
UBS Financial Services, Inc.1.38%2,208,1261,040,756,028+106,498+5.07%
Managed Account Advisors LLC
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4163455-letter-shareholders-blackrocks-2017-annual-report




Suzanne M. Vertosick
Secretary
Executive Director
Extra Mile Education Foundation
Address

Two Gateway Center
Suite 348
603 Stanwix Street, Pittsburgh 15222-1423



Due to its power and the sheer size and scope of its financial assets and activities, BlackRock has been called the world's largest shadow bank.[4][5]

BlackRock merged with Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (MLIM) in 2006,[8][12] halving PNC's ownership and giving Merrill Lynch a 49.5% stake in the company
BlackRock Solutions was retained by the U. S. Treasury Department in May 2009[17] to manage the toxic mortgage assets (i.e. to analyze, unwind, and price) that were owned by Bear StearnsAIG, Inc.Freddie MacMorgan Stanley, and other financial firms that were affected in the 2008 financial crisis
Scottish Widows Awards £30 Billion Fund Contract to BlackRock
Scottish Widows has awarded the contract to manage £30 billion in passive index strategies to BlackRock, under the terms of a wider collaboration agreement on alternative assets and tech. The agreement follows the group's decision at the beginning of the year to pull a £109 billion contract from Aberdeen following the company's merger with Standard Life.

Law360, Trenton (August 20, 2018, 6:46 PM EDT) -- The shareholders of two BlackRock Inc. mutual funds told a New Jersey federal judge Monday that they pay “excessive” advisory fees compared to the amounts funds that receive advisory services from other institutions pay,...

5th

https://www.extramilefdn.org/board_staff.php

William S. Demchak

President & Chief Executive Officer

PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.







to: william imcheck

Gregory B. Jordan

Vice Chairman & Chairman of the Development CommitteeExecutive Vice President & General Counsel

PNC Financial Services

cc; state representative robin shackelford,
    pnc 10th st 46201 branch.
   nuvo news editor
   casey foley

new conflict.
problem;
2 weeks late w payment, bank closed account without telling me.
refuses to let me know by email.
refuse ot tell em when i aske in person.

appointment: 2 pm monday wth branch manager.

issue: on 10/17/18 i was told that if i paid $165 and waited two days, they would issue me a new card. this was a material false statement, either reckless or knowing,
which induced me to pay the $165. after i paid the $165, they  did not uphol their end of the bargain, but simply took my money.

i think this violates indiana law, at least civl and possibly criminal.

issue: in 2015 my account was closed and  was told that the closure was permanent and there was nothing i could do about it. i sighed, brushed off my legal skills, and got it re-opened.

issue: uring the 90 day winowwhen i asked the teller what my balance was, she didnt tell me.

issue: notice to refrain from spoliation.
issue: 2500 balance. i will not repudiate this debt. however, i am disinclined ot pay anything further while this conflict remains unresolved. if i make my payments nto an escrow fun wiith a lawyer, will that be aequate evience tha t am acting in good faith? that's how i would handle it if it were a landlord tenant dispute.

issue: i seek reasonable accommodation for my medical condition, go into details here.

issue: i'm a lawyer.  17147-53.up till now, we have been allies; you've been one of my banks and i've been one of your customers. that could change.
i strongly value our relationship and i'm trying to fix it, not cause a rift.

issue: today 1 spent 75 minutes on the phone with you, after two in person trips to the bank. this took time away from my law practice, caausing a loss of $235, my rate for an hour. if we cannot resolve our dispute amicably, there could be many more such hours in the future.


issue: i'm an effective complainer, trained by dr john bear. i will prevail eventually, or die of old age first. at the moment i know almost nothing about indiana's regulatory structure for banks, or which causes of action against banks have  legal fees provisions. but i could start to educate myself. it would be far more efficient to resolve our dispute quickly and simply. if i do some research, i might find some mass tort lawyers who could use a hand.
 forgive my tone here. i really really want to fix things, not widen a dispute.
at the moment i am at a complete impass, an spent an hour being told nothing can be done. you may be an immovable object, but i am an unstoppable force. that's an aristotle reference.

issue: the 46201 zip code, where i live in where your bank is, is a poverty stricken area. if you treat all your customers here the way i am beng treated, that could raise regulatory issues. maybe such concerns would eventually prove unfounded, after several years of expensiive discovery. can't we just get along?

this is a quick off the cuff letter before i even start to research it. it's been only a few hours since the incident. once i dig into it, if i need to , i can send more letters with far more specific allegations. again, i'd rather not.

i mostly focus on suing government agencies for violations of various civil rghts. i'm a republican, support the free market, and believe in theory that you shoul be able to run your bank however you want, so long as it is honest.
getting into a complex dispute with a bank would be a distraction from  my more important work. i am aware that ths reeks of the sort of annoying liberalism i don't really care for. nonetheless, at the moment i am feeling defensive, since that 10,000 line of credit is something i have carefully maintained over the past 18 or so years. when i bought a house earlier this year for $8000 in cash,i relie on knowing that if i ran out of funs i ha the line of credit as a back-up. now suddenly you have yanked that out from under me, and i  feel burgalrized. the plan was to rehab the property and list it for $40k. now i'll have to try to auction it off for a mimimum bid of 20k.
even it turns out i have no legal recourse, i'm not sure this woul be a public relations victory for you. go check out the united breaks guitars video.
this is a rough first draft. all for now. 9:11 pm 10/19/2018.



Archabbot
Douglas R. Nowicki

Saint Vincent Archabbey

https://en.whttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banking_systemikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banking_systemhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banking_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_banking_system


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackRock

ey people
Larry Fink
(Chairman and CEO)
Robert Kapito
(President)
ProductsAsset management
RevenueIncrease US$12.491 billion (2017)[1]
Increase US$5.272 billion (2017)[1]
Increase US$4.970 billion (2017)[1]
AUMIncrease US$6.288 trillion (2017)[1]
Total assetsIncrease US$223 billion (2017)[1]
Total equityIncrease US$31.825 billion (2017)[citation needed]
Number of employees
Increase 13,900 (2017)[citation need
https://www.extramilefdn.org/annual_report.php
BlackRock joins the ranks of other asset managers, such as Jackson National Life Insurance Co., T. Rowe Price, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and American Century Investments, to have been sued by their retirement plan participants for self-dealing within the last year or so.
current litigation


Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. et al, 

By actively benefiting itself through the selection and retention of these funds, BlackRock breached its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, plaintiff Charles Baird, a plan participant, claims

pnc.> black rock shadow bank > largest stockholer in american outoor brands > smith and wesson > Feb. 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla. 

farrell DenbyBlackRock (BLK) spokesman, said in an email the money manager — American Outdoor Brands' largest shareholder at 12.4% of outstanding stock — would not be commenting on the vote. BlackRock in March posted questions on its website it would be asking major gun-makers and retailers following the Feb. 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla. Among the questions posed were asking gun manufacturers and distributors what their strategies are for "managing the reputational, financial and litigation risk" associated with making and selling civilian firearms; whether they were 

issue:





get creit car pnc
get hawaii reservation
file tort claim re metoo at state house
internal affairs capitol police
answer an counterclaims re metro evelopment lawsuit.
 Ana Solorio • Jojo Solorio
tommy inian unclaime
mr bruce agenda





Yoceli Y Palafox Solorio

 Ana Solorio • 
Jojo Solorio


Contact Information 
Email: Sarah.Sleder@SpecialCounsel.com      
Telephone: (248) 729-2253
ganization nominating a candidate of another political organization, the provisions were facially neutral and violated neither the equal protection clause nor the rights of free and equal elections and freedom of speech and assembly. Summary relief denied.
Petitioner political party sought summary relief because the commissioner refused to process their candidate’s nomination papers on the grounds that the candidate’s name was already presented by nomination petitions from another party. Petitioner requested a declaratory judgment that the anti-fusion provisions of the election code were unconstitutional under the United States and Pennsylvania constitutions and a writ of mandamus directing the commonwealth to process the party’s nomination papers and to prepare a general election ballot showing that the candidate was nominated by both parties. The court held that mandamus was not the appropriate way to test the constitutionality of a statute and dismissed that count.

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

water plants
pnc caar
sort papers
make list of ealines
motion for finings of fact.
research hawaii tix
call mom.

Tuesday, October 16, 2018



stuff i got one tuesay

- mae a 10 item list
1- picke up launry
2 - cleane at 1116 for an hour.
3 - scrap run $21, new place
4 - pai $100 on water bill.
5 pai bruce $10.
6. fixe tire $5
coffee $2.
worke on routine for tonight.

not one yet:
tommy to library






to do

file motion for findings of fact and law

public records request for all of palafox's cases

letter to federal court concerning notice by email.

file moton for findings of fact and law

caption

motion for findings of fact and law, counterclaimant requests an demands fniings of facts and law.
proceuraal facts

yoceli palafox, via her employee h h, sued stewart in 9list case number.

after stewart reminded them oof them of his right to a hearing, that they had failed to exhaust aministrative remedies, that case was dismissed, and hearing was held. the parties agree to try to cooperate, but after two weeks palafox stopped cooperating and refiled the case which is now this case.

with his answer, stewart filed counterclaims against h h an crossclaims against palafox,

incluing that she had violate the 4th amenment by forceably entering his home without a warrant.

to palafox;
avon aress.
personal an confiental.

please be advised of the following

you came into my house without a warrant, which was a fourth amendment violation.

later, silvia mller-- became a co-conspirator in your civil rights violation by using the poisonous fruit of your illegal search as evidence against me in a lawsuit..

i filed a counterclaim against h h and crossclaims
 against you. those were improperly dismissed, so the case is now being prepared for appeal.

if the appeal fails, an i don't have a great recor in the iniana court of appeals, the next step woul be a isciplinary complaint against miller


















1.  launry
2  water bll  
3  bank to order creit car
4  plants
5.  tommy
6  sort papers into case fles.
7  look up hawaii tickets.
8  call mom.
9. look into loan on oil.

Knock Knock Who's There? Cotton! Cotton who?  

We're caught in a trap
I can't walk out
Because I love you too much, baby
Why can't you see
What you're doing to me
When you don't believe a word I say?
We can't go on together
With suspicious minds (suspicious minds)
And we can't build our dreams
On suspicious minds

Sunday, October 14, 2018

The new Performance and Policy division, which was established by IMPD Chief Bryan Roach earlier this month, is tasked with reviewing every use of force incident, regardless if a complaint was filed. 
https://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/indianapolis/man-claims-impd-officers-went-too-far-internal-affairs-investigating-if-proper-force-was-used_

Saturday, October 13, 2018

Teslanomics
600 B St Suite 300
San DiegoCA 92101
clues; avon, 
Bachelor of Applied Science (B.A.Sc.), Public Health@Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
Meaningful Day Services 
sent reference request.
seems ot have attene avon high

Wednesday, October 10, 2018

Ankany, William H.

BATTLE UNIT NAME:
7th Regiment, Iowa Cavalry
SIDE:
Union
COMPANY:
D
SOLDIER'S RANK IN:
Private
SOLDIER'S RANK OUT:
First Sergeant
ALTERNATE NAME:
William H./Ankeny
FILM NUMBER:
M541 ROLL 1
PLAQUE NUMBER:
NOTES:
General Note - Original filed under William H./Ankeny

Ankany, William H.

BATTLE UNIT NAME:
7th Regiment, Iowa Cavalry
SIDE:
Union
COMPANY:
D
SOLDIER'S RANK IN:
Private
SOLDIER'S RANK OUT:
First Sergeant
ALTERNATE NAME:
William H./Ankeny
FILM NUMBER:
M541 ROLL 1
PLAQUE NUMBER:
NOTES:
General Note - Original filed under William H./Ankeny

Monday, October 08, 2018

Buddy you're a boy make a big noise
Playin' in the street gonna be a big man some day
You got mud on yo' face
You big disgrace
Kickin' your can all over the place
Singin'

Well I'm on my way to heaven
We shall not be moved
On my way to heaven
We shall not be moved
Just like a tree that's standing by the water side
We shall not be moved

Buddy you're a young man hard man
Shouting in the street gonna take on the world some day
You got blood on yo' face
You big disgrace
Wavin' your banner all over the place

On the road to freedom

We shall not be moved
On the road to freedom
We shall not be moved
Just like a tree that's standing by the water side
We shall not be moved
We will we will rock you
Sing it
We will we will rock you
Buddy you're an old man poor man
Pleadin' with your eyes gonna make
You

Feb 2010 ESPN magazine interview with Brain May: Queen decided that it needed a simple, anthemic tune that could connect with the audience. The morning after the show, May woke up with a stomp-stomp-clap beat rolling around in his head. To accompany that big rhythm, he sat down and wrote depressing lyrics that described the futility of man. The lyrics begin with a young man dreaming of a better life, in the second stanza the boy is now a young man battling to reach lofty goals and the song ends with an old mans dreams unfulfilled. The chorus is not a rally call. It is a Czech lullaby which a parent promises a child " we will, we will rock you." Great article by Seth Wickersom tracking down the meaning of the most popular stadium anthem. The song was recorded in an empty church because Queen loved the acoustics.


Thursday, October 04, 2018


ANALYSIS

This case presents the question about whether the Marion County Sheriff s Office properly denied the Complainant’s recorcls request.
1. The Access to Public Records Act (“APRA”)
It is the public policy of the State of Indiana that all persons are entitled to full and complete information regarding the affairs of government and the official acts of those who rep- resent them as public officials and employees. Ind. Code § 5- 11-5-i. Further, APRA states that “(p)roviding persons with information is an essential function of a representative government and an integral part of the roiitine duties of public officials and employees, whose duty it is to provide the information.” Id. There is no dispiite that the Marion County Sheriff s Office (“MCSO”) is a piiblic agency for the purposes of the APRA; and thiis, subject to the Act’s disclo- sure requirements. Ind. Code § 5-14-3-2(q)(6).
Therefore, unless otherwise provided by statute, any person may inspect and copy the MCSO’s public records during i ts regrdar business hours. See Ind. Code § 5-14-0-3(a).


[1] The First Amendment embraces the right to communicate and associate anonymously. See Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., 525 U.S. 182, 119 S.Ct. 636, 142 L.Ed.2d 599 (1999); McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S. 334, 115 S.Ct. 1511, 131 L.Ed.2d 426 (1995); Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 96 S.Ct. 612, 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976); Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60, 80 S.Ct. 536, 4 L.Ed.2d 559 (1960); National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449, 78 S.Ct. 1163, 2 L.Ed.2d 1488 (1958).


50 F.Supp.2d 835
United States District Court,
N.D. Indiana,
South Bend Division.

AMERICAN KNIGHTS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN, Plaintiff, v.
CITY OF GOSHEN, INDIANA, Defendant.
No. 3:98CV403RM.
|May 4, 1999.

Turning to the current briefing, we begin with DePaul's claim that Section 1513 violates Article I, Section 7 of our Constitution, which provides:
The printing press shall be free to every person who may undertake to examine the proceedings of the Legislature or any branch of government, and no law shall ever be made to restrain the right thereof. The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the invaluable rights of man, and every citizen may freely speak, write and print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty. No conviction shall be had in any prosecution for the publication of papers relating to the official conduct of officers or men in public capacity, or to any other matter proper for public investigation or information, where the fact that such publication was not maliciously or negligently made shall be established to the satisfaction of the jury; and in all indictments for libels the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.
PA. CONST. art. I, § 7 (emphasis added). DePaul notes that, when a party mounts an individual rights challenge under the Pennsylvania Constitution, the party should undertake an independent analysis such as was suggested in this Court's seminal decision in Commonwealth v. Edmunds,526 Pa. 374586 A.2d 887 (1991). "Edmunds directs advocates to brief and analyze the following four factors when litigating a claim that state constitutional doctrine should depart from the applicable federal standard: (1) the text of the provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution; (2) the history of the provision, including the caselaw of this Commonwealth; (3) relevant caselaw from other jurisdictions; and (4) policy considerations, `including unique issues of state and local concern, and applicability within modern Pennsylvania jurisprudence.'" Commonwealth v. Sam,597 Pa. 523952 A.2d 565, 585 (2008) (quoting Edmunds, 586 A.2d at 895). DePaul contends that this Court's opinion in Pap's II already provides a thorough Edmunds *542 analysis of the text and history of Article I, Section 7, making it unnecessary to undertake an analysis of the first two Edmunds factors here. See Pap's II, 812 A.2d at 603-10.
https://doi.nebraska.gov/consumer/consumer-assistance

this is where to file a complaint in the nebrasksa case.
 toay - thurs.

took awn to entist. fought w 3 cops.

to do
price plane tix.
order new credit card pnc
file service of process on palafox



mailto:%20liz.stratman@24hourdentalcare.com

this morning at 330 am, my client dawn young was refused service at your company. the stated reason was that she did not have a government-issued dental patient license.the receptionist who was refusing service was unwilling or unable to provide a written policy statement to substantiate her actions.

i asked to speak to the dentist in charge, and let her know that this was arbitrary and capricious discrimination.
ms young, as you already know, is a medwise patient and is entitled to your servives.

we feel that the treatment she received, which included being threatened by 3 armed officers.
was a breach of the duty of good faith which is an implicit term of the insurance contract.

there may or may not have been a breach of professional ethics. i am not currently up on the regulatory or professional standards for dentists.

i want to suggest that in the future if you plan to deny service to a person who shows up in a dental emergency in extreme pain, accompanied by her lawyer, you should have a written policy ready to show.

i apologize for raising my voice. at times the discussion got heated. i am also writing to commend the officer who arrived, listened to the problem, and found a solution.

your receptionist seems to be trained only in rule following, not in problem solving. your dentist seemed to have little grasp of any sense of professional responsibility.

eventually, after we faced down a small army,
we were able to get a commitment that she would get served, and i was able to go home and am back in my bed at 5 am.

i do not specialize in suing, or otherwise complaining about, dentists. i mostly sue election officials and rogue cops. and my client was eventually seen.
if she had not been, this would be a very different letter.

i await your response, before i decide what else if anything i will chose to do about this. 

cordially,
robbin stewart

= notes
 Chapter 7.     Investigation and Prosecution of Complaints Concerning 
                        Regulated Occupations
• Chapter 8.     Occupational and Professional Licensure, Registration, 
                        and Certification Fees
• Chapter 9.     Health Professions Standards of Practice
• Chapter 11.   Professional Licensing Standards of Practice











Wednesday, October 03, 2018

270 days from Feb 2, 2018

Want to figure out the date that is exactly two hundred and seventy days from Feb 2, 2018 without counting?
Your starting date is February 2, 2018 so that means that 270 days later would be October 30, 2018.
You can check this by using the date difference calculator to measure the number of days from Feb 2, 2018 to Oct 30, 2018.
IC 34-13-3-2
Applicability of chapter to bureau of motor vehicles
    
 Sec. 2. This chapter applies to a claim or suit in tort against any of the following:
        (1) A member of the bureau of motor vehicles commission established under IC 9-15-1-1.
        (2) An employee of the bureau of motor vehicles commission who is employed at a license branch under IC 9-16, except for an employee employed at a license branch operated under a contract with the commission under IC 9-16.
notice of tort claim.

to governor
cc curtis hill
     capitol police

On february 2 2018 at about 4:16 pm, i was entering the state house via the west exit. i was assaulted by a john doe capitol police officer.
he grabbed me by the arm, just above the elbow, without provocation, and dragged me out of the building. i re-entered, as he continued to badger and interrogate me.
the cover-up began immediately.
a securatex officer, who was present, the responding capitol police officer who was a coworker of my assailant, and then 4 john doe capitol police officers participated as acceessories after the fact by withholding the name of my attacker. as with watergate, it's the cover-up that is the larger issue.

I next proceeded to where I was going,n, a brief  interview with an undersecretary of state. the topic of the meeting was about voter ID policies and pending litigation. stewart v marion county board.
i then called 911 and reported the incident. i have made 3 or 4 followup visits to the capittol police seeking basic information,such a case number but have been stonewalled by a thin blue line.

this was battery.
it may have been unlawful confinement.
it was a fourth amendment violation, actionable both directly
a la Bivens
and under 42 usc 1983. I have sued and won under 1983 before, which makes my tort claim distinguishable from most.
i am currently litigating the denial of a tort claim in federal court.
his actions violated my rights under the first amendment, my right to travel, and due process.

his actions violate my rights under sections 1, 2, 9, 11, and 12 of article I, the indiana bill of rights.

the other officers conspired with him to violate my civil rights, and  are continuing to do so.

i am willing to settle this claim for $3000 if an agreement in principle is reached within 30 days.

otherwise i look forward to taking it to a jury just for practice.